From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:12:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:11:56 -0400 Received: from [38.160.241.130] ([38.160.241.130]:53214 "EHLO xover.mindspeed.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:11:47 -0400 Message-ID: <87009604743AD411B1F600508BA0F95994C8DF@XOVER.dedham.mindspeed.com> From: "Clayton, Mark" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: The latest Microsoft FUD. This time from BillG, himself. Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:11:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Fulghum [mailto:paulkf@microgate.com] > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:02 PM > To: Pavel Machek; landley@webofficenow.com; Schilling, Richard; > hps@intermeta.de; Henning P. Schmiedehausen; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: The latest Microsoft FUD. This time from BillG, himself. > > > > Is this accurate? I never knew NT was mach-based. I do not think NT > > 1-3 were actually ever shipped, first was NT 3.5 right? > > Pavel > > NT 3.1 was the 1st to ship. > I still have my 3.1 package all boxed up in the basement. I remember impatiently waiting for its arrival. What a disappointment it turned out to be. Mark