From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: Remove sched_idle_cpu() usages in select_task_rq_fair()
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:24:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87212818-1f59-45e4-9a51-dca62ddb9633@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250818124702.163271-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
On 8/18/25 13:47, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> These sched_idle_cpu() considerations in select_task_rq_fair() is based
> on an assumption that the wakee task can pick a cpu running sched_idle
> task and preempt it to run, faster than picking an idle cpu to preempt
> the idle task.
>
> This assumption is correct, but it also brings some problems:
>
> 1. work conservation: Often sched_idle tasks are also picking the cpu
> which is already running sched_idle task, instead of utilizing a real
> idle cpu, so work conservation is somewhat broken.
>
> 2. sched_idle group: This sched_idle_cpu() is just not correct with
> sched_idle group running. Look a simple example below.
>
> root
> / \
> kubepods system
> / \
> burstable besteffort
> (cpu.idle == 1)
>
> When a sched_idle cpu is just running tasks from besteffort group,
> sched_idle_cpu() will return true in this case, but this cpu pick
> is bad for wakee task from system group. Because the system group
> has lower weight than kubepods, work conservation is somewhat
> broken too.
>
> In a nutshell, sched_idle_cpu() should consider the wakee task group's
> relationship with sched_idle tasks running on the cpu.
>
> Obviously, it's hard to do so. This patch chooses the simple approach
> to remove all sched_idle_cpu() considerations in select_task_rq_fair()
> to bring back work conservation in these cases.
OTOH sched_idle_cpu() CPUs are guaranteed to not be in an idle state and
potentially already have DVFS on some higher level...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-18 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-18 12:47 Chengming Zhou
2025-08-18 13:24 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2025-08-19 15:32 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-08-20 13:53 ` Christian Loehle
2025-08-21 1:53 ` Chengming Zhou
2025-08-21 18:13 ` Josh Don
2025-08-25 6:58 ` Chengming Zhou
2025-08-26 18:50 ` Josh Don
2025-08-25 7:42 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87212818-1f59-45e4-9a51-dca62ddb9633@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®