From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apparmor: don't try to replace stale label in ptrace access check
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:23:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8721c54a-9a92-5efa-d7c2-27adda1d3353@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180913161209.63693-1-jannh@google.com>
On 09/13/2018 09:12 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> As a comment above begin_current_label_crit_section() explains,
> begin_current_label_crit_section() must run in sleepable context because
> when label_is_stale() is true, aa_replace_current_label() runs, which uses
> prepare_creds(), which can sleep.
> Until now, the ptrace access check (which runs with a task lock held)
> violated this rule.
>
> Also add a might_sleep() assertion to begin_current_label_crit_section(),
> because asserts are less likely to be ignored than comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
oh ouch, thanks Jann nice catch. I've pulled it into apparmor-next
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> ---
> I have tested that just the might_sleep() yells a lot, and adding the
> rest of the patch stops the yelling.
>
> security/apparmor/include/cred.h | 2 ++
> security/apparmor/lsm.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/cred.h b/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
> index e287b7d0d4be..265ae6641a06 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
> +++ b/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ static inline struct aa_label *begin_current_label_crit_section(void)
> {
> struct aa_label *label = aa_current_raw_label();
>
> + might_sleep();
> +
> if (label_is_stale(label)) {
> label = aa_get_newest_label(label);
> if (aa_replace_current_label(label) == 0)
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> index 8b8b70620bbe..e3f40c20b9b4 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> @@ -114,13 +114,13 @@ static int apparmor_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child,
> struct aa_label *tracer, *tracee;
> int error;
>
> - tracer = begin_current_label_crit_section();
> + tracer = __begin_current_label_crit_section();
> tracee = aa_get_task_label(child);
> error = aa_may_ptrace(tracer, tracee,
> (mode & PTRACE_MODE_READ) ? AA_PTRACE_READ
> : AA_PTRACE_TRACE);
> aa_put_label(tracee);
> - end_current_label_crit_section(tracer);
> + __end_current_label_crit_section(tracer);
>
> return error;
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-13 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-13 16:12 Jann Horn
2018-09-13 16:23 ` John Johansen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8721c54a-9a92-5efa-d7c2-27adda1d3353@canonical.com \
--to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®