From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>,
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: make fsync wait after pre-submission errors
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 07:36:09 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8728a52d-53b5-408e-a541-ee309e970e18@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261030-b4-btrfs-data-integrity-v1-3-f4d4196731e6@toxicpanda.com>
在 2026/10/31 01:08, Josef Bacik 写道:
> Commit f13e01b89daf ("btrfs: ensure fast fsync waits for ordered extents
> after a write failure") made btrfs_finish_ordered_extent() set
> BTRFS_INODE_COW_WRITE_ERROR in the inode when a COW write fails. The flag
> makes the next fast fsync wait for the completion of the ordered extents,
> which is where the extent maps that point to unwritten extents are
> dropped. Otherwise the fsync logs file extent items for them, which is a
> corruption if the log is replayed.
>
> As the comment there says, this is also needed for errors that happen
> before a bio is submitted. But for buffered writes those don't go through
> btrfs_finish_ordered_extent(). When running delalloc fails for a folio
> that already got ordered extents, or a block can't be submitted,
> writepage_delalloc(), submit_write_sector(), extent_write_locked_range()
> and btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() call btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished(),
> which marks the ordered extent with BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR and queues its
> completion without setting the flag:
>
> writeback (or a first fsync) fsync
>
> writepage_delalloc()
> cow_file_range() for range A
> creates extent map and ordered
> extent
> cow_file_range() for range B fails
> btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished(A)
> queues the completion
> no dirty folios, no writeback
> flag is not set, does not wait
> btrfs_log_changed_extents()
> logs the extent map of A
> btrfs_sync_log()
> btrfs_finish_one_ordered()
> drops the extent map
> frees the reserved extent
>
> If the error was already reported, for example to a previous fsync that
> triggered the writeback, this fsync even returns success. After a power
> failure, replaying the log replaces data that was durable before with the
> unwritten extent, for which there are no checksums:
>
> BTRFS warning: csum hole found for disk bytenr range [14434304, 14438400)
> BTRFS warning: csum failed root 5 ino 267 off 0 csum 0x8941f998 expected
> csum 0x00000000 mirror 1
>
> Both functions share can_finish_ordered_extent(), so set the flag there.
Sashiko reported a critical level problem, you may want to check it:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261030-b4-btrfs-data-integrity-v1-0-f4d4196731e6%40toxicpanda.com
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Fixes: f13e01b89daf ("btrfs: ensure fast fsync waits for ordered extents after a write failure")
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.10+
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> index df74c75d6c29..6543e99055f2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> @@ -401,6 +401,37 @@ static bool can_finish_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered,
> if (!uptodate)
> btrfs_mark_ordered_extent_error(ordered);
>
> + /*
> + * If this is a COW write it means we created new extent maps for the
> + * range and they point to unwritten locations if we got an error either
> + * before submitting a bio or during IO.
> + *
> + * We have marked the ordered extent with BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR, and we
> + * are queuing its completion once all its IO is done. During completion,
> + * at btrfs_finish_one_ordered(), we will drop the extent maps for the
> + * unwritten extents.
> + *
> + * However because completion runs in a work queue we can end up having
> + * a fast fsync running before that. In the case of direct IO, once we
> + * unlock the inode the fsync might start, and we queue the completion
> + * before unlocking the inode. In the case of buffered IO when writeback
> + * finishes (end_bbio_data_write()) we queue the completion, so if the
> + * writeback was triggered by a fast fsync, the fsync might start
> + * logging before ordered extent completion runs in the work queue.
> + *
> + * The fast fsync will log file extent items based on the extent maps it
> + * finds, so if by the time it collects extent maps the ordered extent
> + * completion didn't happen yet, it will log file extent items that
> + * point to unwritten extents, resulting in a corruption if a crash
> + * happens and the log tree is replayed. Note that a fast fsync does not
> + * wait for completion of ordered extents in order to reduce latency.
> + *
> + * Set a flag in the inode so that the next fast fsync will wait for
> + * ordered extents to complete before starting to log.
> + */
> + if (!uptodate && !test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW, &ordered->flags))
> + set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_COW_WRITE_ERROR, &inode->runtime_flags);
> +
> if (ordered->bytes_left)
> return false;
>
> @@ -436,37 +467,6 @@ void btrfs_finish_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered,
> uptodate);
> spin_unlock(&inode->ordered_tree_lock);
>
> - /*
> - * If this is a COW write it means we created new extent maps for the
> - * range and they point to unwritten locations if we got an error either
> - * before submitting a bio or during IO.
> - *
> - * We have marked the ordered extent with BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR, and we
> - * are queuing its completion below. During completion, at
> - * btrfs_finish_one_ordered(), we will drop the extent maps for the
> - * unwritten extents.
> - *
> - * However because completion runs in a work queue we can end up having
> - * a fast fsync running before that. In the case of direct IO, once we
> - * unlock the inode the fsync might start, and we queue the completion
> - * before unlocking the inode. In the case of buffered IO when writeback
> - * finishes (end_bbio_data_write()) we queue the completion, so if the
> - * writeback was triggered by a fast fsync, the fsync might start
> - * logging before ordered extent completion runs in the work queue.
> - *
> - * The fast fsync will log file extent items based on the extent maps it
> - * finds, so if by the time it collects extent maps the ordered extent
> - * completion didn't happen yet, it will log file extent items that
> - * point to unwritten extents, resulting in a corruption if a crash
> - * happens and the log tree is replayed. Note that a fast fsync does not
> - * wait for completion of ordered extents in order to reduce latency.
> - *
> - * Set a flag in the inode so that the next fast fsync will wait for
> - * ordered extents to complete before starting to log.
> - */
> - if (!uptodate && !test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW, &ordered->flags))
> - set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_COW_WRITE_ERROR, &inode->runtime_flags);
> -
> if (ret)
> btrfs_queue_ordered_fn(ordered);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 14:38 [PATCH 0/5] btrfs: data integrity fixes Josef Bacik
2026-10-30 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: don't drop the error of the last split bio Josef Bacik
2026-10-30 21:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-10-30 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs: clear dirty blocks after a delalloc failure Josef Bacik
2026-10-30 20:57 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-10-30 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: make fsync wait after pre-submission errors Josef Bacik
2026-10-30 21:06 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2026-10-30 14:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: don't report success for a skipped log sync Josef Bacik
2026-10-30 14:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: don't trim the target of a device replace Josef Bacik
2026-10-30 21:02 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8728a52d-53b5-408e-a541-ee309e970e18@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®