From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BABB1350A18 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2026 23:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788650135; cv=none; b=sSZU1Tyx923NouMh8fAwwS/JwO5g35UKtcOupIWeSJkQB10sBhpsZGAtzKjvkuPcOee0d8JMkTUBrzYJCcd4IdGU4gCTTvnSr0v1dnp1U2itrZjI+dJIXUKLQmpJrdgPo3k2N1z57AglAdrrImd9XPUxQYulc8IKh9Z8RZp7OHA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788650135; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZiTz7Qa/G6sR1D2oS6VJicw2PYN3htCTPywCV9DsBu4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BDm4LXearrk5mwe/MKO3nuFVBdkjaSI+A/zRPaH6iqkGYfR6kF7VP/WtIEPTjALIfujdOOqGxAsULBUZQsvMKbMaLBC0I8/GAPuHTX54Rm7ZcJfvg6/NUzKO2aUXloNAbGjMZtQI70rixkvbrSzz29iW79iC5rXmzp+JAJh+Kwk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=C881xpbS; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=pbTi2MVf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="C881xpbS"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="pbTi2MVf" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1788650129; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SiDXFGa23Fp54xARcEvJJTEcjmmDUs3g5SjxYCl8aw4=; b=C881xpbSKqnTxNmsY5wUhADTe8+MD2MohoNicU+Evq27egUKu50oofR1XBsdEJej9q49t/ n5hqQVxE8spAkH6/QehX6RvuUus4W/3HqKuu2PglyF0JJNp47H9GTBD4C3RQaqInSk5Svz 4HEfyMzZv4b6Ls/3aQ2A2KHiZR6iS8Mr2OobjyePTwcts5rM9DOa1aJTXcPtAZyrEnL6Xa Fyi4tBlwGyXfnKrv1uwvZ5axH30D7oqBVlxkhWB5eqUu47DHkB8XbEuCfEpDNC0C4/ELgW 7YZhAJ3SS9p2yV6mwYkawwzzZmz2QTBupgPU+LWMiCewmsB4/CAp1s7qp/MCQQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1788650129; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SiDXFGa23Fp54xARcEvJJTEcjmmDUs3g5SjxYCl8aw4=; b=pbTi2MVf8WseP/9QXCOFAvdNeBJFPtqdnyQTnoLMFUXi0nVjhdz2NW0ta5XmJWpZEM20eZ BeGgKPGaHcvxtTCg== To: Bradley Morgan , liushugao@xiaomi.com Cc: frederic@kernel.org, isaacmanjarres@google.com, lingyue@xiaomi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, weipengliang@xiaomi.com, wengjinfei@xiaomi.com, xiongliang@xiaomi.com, zhangjiawei8@xiaomi.com, zhukaiqian@xiaomi.com, Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?5Zue5aSNOg==?= [External Mail][PATCH] tick/broadcast: Plug clockevents replacement race In-Reply-To: <347CE2FE-3675-44AA-80D4-1CF8632C8C9D@mainlining.org> References: <20361A3E-0D14-4CC5-946E-D75244CB4A45@mainlining.org> <87h5k34cob.ffs@fw13> <4FDB69E5-7DEE-43CE-A66A-23A2D8DC987C@mainlining.org> <87bjab4avu.ffs@fw13> <347CE2FE-3675-44AA-80D4-1CF8632C8C9D@mainlining.org> Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 01:15:28 +0200 Message-ID: <8733vn47e7.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, Sep 05 2026 at 23:06, Bradley Morgan wrote: > On 5 September 2026 23:00:05 BST, Thomas Gleixner > wrote: >>On Sat, Sep 05 2026 at 22:24, Bradley Morgan wrote: >>> On 5 September 2026 22:21:24 BST, Thomas Gleixner >>wrote: >>>>On Thu, Sep 03 2026 at 16:12, Bradley Morgan wrote: >>>>> Hi, I have a pixel 7, if I could be asked to backport this, then I'll >>be >>>>> happy to, for the fix, add: >>>>> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan >>>> >>>>It would be helpful to respond to the actual patch and not to some >>>>arbitrary reply. That way you might avoid your tags to be overseen by >>>>tools. >>>> >>> Sorry my mail client sometimes glitches, >> >>I fail to see how your mail client is responsible for you to hit reply >>on the wrong mail. >> >>But what do I know about all these new fangled mail clients who decide >>on their own what to do. When this happens to me I'm 100% confident that >>_I_ got it wrong and not my mail client. Maybe I'm just too old-school. >> > Remove Daniel too. Bounces. Sorry no. That's not how this works #1 An OOO response is purely informational and does not justify to remove the recipient from the CC list just because #2 A bouncing email address is of course a valid reason to remove someone from CC, but it is a matter of courtesy in the context of the Linux kernel lists to lookup whether the person vansished from the planet or just changed the mail address. That's what the MAINTAINERS file is for. The thread you responded to was from TWO years ago... Aside of that you did not respond to my actual complaint about responding to a random reply instead of responding to the actual patch. If you fail to review what the AI agent of your choice hallucinates then so be it, but don't be surprised that I'm going to put you on my ignore list as a consequence and recommend to all other maintainers to do so as well. Thomas