mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v3 2/2] printk/nbcon: Change nbcon_irq_work to IRQ_WORK_LAZY
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 11:59:32 +0206	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8733vt8fhf.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901093245.344455-3-john.ogness@linutronix.de>

On 2026-09-01, John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Change the nbcon_irq_work to be IRQ_WORK_LAZY, thus not raising
> an IRQ upon irq_work queuing. The irq_work is then handled on the
> next kernel tick. This additional delay is acceptable because
> nbcon_irq_work is only responsible for non-emergency deferred
> printing, which is delayed anyway. This has the benefit of not
> needing to raise an IRQ for each printk() call.
>
> On a side note, the Tegra20 and Tegra30 platforms can hang if an
> irq_work IRQ is raised while entering cpuidle states. This problem
> was reproducible by calling printk() while entering cpuidle. So
> this change also provides a workaround for these platforms (as long
> as they are not running tickless).
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f3757a75-0ba1-4558-bf57-f19ab7e59a4c@nvidia.com
> Fixes: 76f258bf3f2a ("printk: nbcon: Introduce printer kthreads")
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>

Sorry, I failed to gather the previous tags:

Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01  9:31 [PATCH printk v3 0/2] nbcon irq_work fixes John Ogness
2026-09-01  9:31 ` [PATCH printk v3 1/2] printk/nbcon: Flush nbcon_irq_work in nbcon_free() John Ogness
2026-09-02  9:06   ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-01  9:31 ` [PATCH printk v3 2/2] printk/nbcon: Change nbcon_irq_work to IRQ_WORK_LAZY John Ogness
2026-09-01  9:53   ` John Ogness [this message]
2026-09-02 10:02 ` [PATCH printk v3 0/2] nbcon irq_work fixes Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8733vt8fhf.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
    --to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®