From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9833517BB35 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765462785; cv=none; b=PucZa99yh2NXaB36rQzoCAi48Gjffi8MuF6fuCx89o4JvSoiretKPHnVYCEVblI4yKzluEcANRfJCHsPYEfRcD8IvQ9vvcptf77HJZilaxOb26kvU7NpohV/I7y8NLlyigKsCSHwG6b793OfXdm4BZ+PDRN6/WyfTUxAq8GlXqE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765462785; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8rjys0EWHdXH6WGIS1Zzap+OABSzfKqtGnMMZqg29FI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=swfM8B2GDRPq47g6tKqgCMvuzfESdjHCvn1msnmoV+l45cDpQoczfIEUjjsnhH0800fxRS6GrNanVZA1pFEWPF5B3FX3ENeL0f773eZs79GEj+1bIWUsp83HrUvCjtu6AVE4/qxNHJJ5B6tNQPHcUzkBbRwwQGSsvcGcNKfeBSM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=zeztCUkh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="zeztCUkh" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34F56C1934C; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1015E6068C; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 61B29103C8C1E; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:19:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1765462775; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=8rjys0EWHdXH6WGIS1Zzap+OABSzfKqtGnMMZqg29FI=; b=zeztCUkh2ghNaWhvbCqXv/dW6nAyuBawnJCDfOAjKgOB/lwpeHBaU/zyJlfOLfWxx7oMmv ojQc7vlyeliMXBXKgj3sFo2y1g4J1lXNjLXE8NBefvuXKslzYDA1wWMSggdLLjNHsprfZ9 +fSVZjMMP3Jcor1nstjNVagQxP7YHarSP9Dar21M6+RY/Ubx0cEUn9Yq1ZLIEtpcPDl6qR LoJEAH/ri8YRBZmogJHQo3uVRxLEiLc5daO3KOgBDuf5FVMfGzoPZ2PG9fCAKyT7UYrY1a +ATM18UShpbTtfA3ygelN/vMGRenpIc+Mfbff/DWQ0MqwLre54yT/SZ0WcR72Q== From: Miquel Raynal To: Mark Brown Cc: Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Michael Walle , Tudor Ambarus , Pratyush Yadav , Thomas Petazzoni , Steam Lin , Santhosh Kumar K , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] spi: spi-mem: Create a secondary read operation In-Reply-To: (Mark Brown's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2025 11:06:11 +0900") References: <20251205-winbond-v6-18-rc1-cont-read-v1-0-01bc48631c73@bootlin.com> <20251205-winbond-v6-18-rc1-cont-read-v1-5-01bc48631c73@bootlin.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 30.2 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:19:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87345h6qz0.fsf@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On 11/12/2025 at 11:06:11 +09, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 08:38:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > >> The choice of defining two variables named primary and secondary instead >> of using an array of templates is on purpose, to simplify the reading. I >> find less obvious the use of an array here but this is personal taste. > > This makes sense to me: > > Acked-by: Mark Brown > > Feel free to carry both these patches along with the rest of the > series, if/when you do end up applying it a signed tag would probably be > a good idea in case there's some collision with other SPI work. Thanks a lot for the feedback. Yes, when the series is considered ready, I'll take care of that tag. Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l