From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix minor typos in comments
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 13:26:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87379aveek.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170719082955.GA30088@kroah.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2139 bytes --]
Fix minor typos in comments.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
index 8ed24ec1255d..7a1133661a65 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int ll_lookup_it_finish(struct ptlrpc_request *request,
*de = alias;
if (!it_disposition(it, DISP_LOOKUP_NEG)) {
- /* we have lookup look - unhide dentry */
+ /* We have the "lookup" lock, so unhide dentry */
if (bits & MDS_INODELOCK_LOOKUP)
d_lustre_revalidate(*de);
} else if (!it_disposition(it, DISP_OPEN_CREATE)) {
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
index 3eb66cea65db..ae97c6f1aeb0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
@@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ int mdc_revalidate_lock(struct obd_export *exp, struct lookup_intent *it,
* If we're performing a creation, that means that unless the creation
* failed with EEXIST, we should fake up a negative dentry.
*
- * For everything else, we want to lookup to succeed.
+ * For everything else, we want the lookup to succeed.
*
* One additional note: if CREATE or OPEN succeeded, we add an extra
* reference to the request because we need to keep it around until
@@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ int mdc_revalidate_lock(struct obd_export *exp, struct lookup_intent *it,
* exactly what it_status refers to.
*
* If DISP_OPEN_OPEN is set, then it_status refers to the open() call,
- * otherwise if DISP_OPEN_CREATE is set, then it status is the
+ * otherwise if DISP_OPEN_CREATE is set, then it_status is the
* creation failure mode. In either case, one of DISP_LOOKUP_NEG or
* DISP_LOOKUP_POS will be set, indicating whether the child lookup
* was successful.
--
2.12.2
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-02 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-18 23:26 [PATCH 00/12] Assorted lustre fixes and improvements NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 06/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unneeded 'err' arg to ldlm_process_flock_lock() NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 03/12] staging: lustre: llite: fix various issues with ll_splice_alias NeilBrown
2017-07-19 2:51 ` Oleg Drokin
2017-07-19 4:33 ` NeilBrown
2017-07-19 6:18 ` Oleg Drokin
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 07/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'flags' arg from ldlm_process_flock_lock() NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: tidy list walking in ldlm_flock() NeilBrown
[not found] ` <BN6PR1101MB2132359E48C9904D3E305EE7CBA60@BN6PR1101MB2132.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2017-07-19 4:36 ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 09/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'flags' arg from ldlm_flock_destroy() NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 02/12] staging: lustre: llite: fix incorrect DCACHE_DISCONNECTED test NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 12/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unused field 'fwd_generation' NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unnecessary 'ownlocks' variable NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 04/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'first_enq' arg from ldlm_process_flock_lock() NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 01/12] staging: lustre: fix minor typos in comments NeilBrown
2017-07-19 8:29 ` Greg KH
2017-08-02 3:26 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-08-03 17:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH] " James Simmons
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 08/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unused 'overlaps' variable NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 05/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unused 'work_list' arg from ldlm_process_flock_lock() NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87379aveek.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome