mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix minor typos in comments
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 13:26:11 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87379aveek.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170719082955.GA30088@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2139 bytes --]


Fix minor typos in comments.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
index 8ed24ec1255d..7a1133661a65 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int ll_lookup_it_finish(struct ptlrpc_request *request,
 	*de = alias;
 
 	if (!it_disposition(it, DISP_LOOKUP_NEG)) {
-		/* we have lookup look - unhide dentry */
+		/* We have the "lookup" lock, so unhide dentry */
 		if (bits & MDS_INODELOCK_LOOKUP)
 			d_lustre_revalidate(*de);
 	} else if (!it_disposition(it, DISP_OPEN_CREATE)) {
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
index 3eb66cea65db..ae97c6f1aeb0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
@@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ int mdc_revalidate_lock(struct obd_export *exp, struct lookup_intent *it,
  * If we're performing a creation, that means that unless the creation
  * failed with EEXIST, we should fake up a negative dentry.
  *
- * For everything else, we want to lookup to succeed.
+ * For everything else, we want the lookup to succeed.
  *
  * One additional note: if CREATE or OPEN succeeded, we add an extra
  * reference to the request because we need to keep it around until
@@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ int mdc_revalidate_lock(struct obd_export *exp, struct lookup_intent *it,
  * exactly what it_status refers to.
  *
  * If DISP_OPEN_OPEN is set, then it_status refers to the open() call,
- * otherwise if DISP_OPEN_CREATE is set, then it status is the
+ * otherwise if DISP_OPEN_CREATE is set, then it_status is the
  * creation failure mode.  In either case, one of DISP_LOOKUP_NEG or
  * DISP_LOOKUP_POS will be set, indicating whether the child lookup
  * was successful.
-- 
2.12.2


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-02  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18 23:26 [PATCH 00/12] Assorted lustre fixes and improvements NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 06/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unneeded 'err' arg to ldlm_process_flock_lock() NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 03/12] staging: lustre: llite: fix various issues with ll_splice_alias NeilBrown
2017-07-19  2:51   ` Oleg Drokin
2017-07-19  4:33     ` NeilBrown
2017-07-19  6:18       ` Oleg Drokin
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 07/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'flags' arg from ldlm_process_flock_lock() NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: tidy list walking in ldlm_flock() NeilBrown
     [not found]   ` <BN6PR1101MB2132359E48C9904D3E305EE7CBA60@BN6PR1101MB2132.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2017-07-19  4:36     ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 09/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'flags' arg from ldlm_flock_destroy() NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 02/12] staging: lustre: llite: fix incorrect DCACHE_DISCONNECTED test NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 12/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unused field 'fwd_generation' NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unnecessary 'ownlocks' variable NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 04/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'first_enq' arg from ldlm_process_flock_lock() NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 01/12] staging: lustre: fix minor typos in comments NeilBrown
2017-07-19  8:29   ` Greg KH
2017-08-02  3:26     ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-08-03 17:29       ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH] " James Simmons
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 08/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unused 'overlaps' variable NeilBrown
2017-07-18 23:26 ` [PATCH 05/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unused 'work_list' arg from ldlm_process_flock_lock() NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87379aveek.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome