From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Only obtain cpu_hotplug_lock if called by rtasd
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 20:10:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8737attzw5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1497996510-4032-1-git-send-email-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Calling arch_update_cpu_topology from a CPU hotplug state machine callback
> hits a deadlock because the function tries to get a read lock on
> cpu_hotplug_lock while the state machine still holds a write lock on it.
>
> Since all callers of arch_update_cpu_topology except rtasd already hold
> cpu_hotplug_lock, this patch changes the function to use
> stop_machine_cpuslocked and creates a separate function for rtasd which
> still tries to obtain the lock.
>
> Michael Bringmann investigated the bug and provided a detailed analysis
> of the deadlock on this previous RFC for an alternate solution:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/771293/
Do we know when this broke? Or has it never worked?
Should it go to stable? (can't in its current form AFAICS)
> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> This patch applies on tip/smp/hotplug, it should probably be carried there.
stop_machine_cpuslocked() doesn't exist in mainline so I think it has to
be carried there right?
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-21 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-20 22:08 Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-21 10:10 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2017-06-22 1:14 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-22 12:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-22 13:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-22 19:24 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-06-22 21:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-23 4:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-23 7:37 ` [tip:smp/hotplug] " tip-bot for Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8737attzw5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®