From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0333D4DAF8C; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 15:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790955233; cv=none; b=mvXXNDTMT1pU5+6OF7tfIehgymTavgh2H49AmMq5GmdWtwUCyyEAjQhqH8DssON0gACuKnAS/rRUOK8kLBDiyU4HDcuNZgDqkzNqD/14YaAPgRuYEHY31SDVXKvTwiEQHPUTLPhJ6SZ6fwmPV/r4Wy36Go0iz2oN9B8KQTUKqAc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790955233; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n2LN/j089HOizN1MoojMoOcOlZAfWpfpx4ZfjpRHkag=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IjH6j5xhiqwmtkvveZiw79lSKyfhT+oWxx1qqpK6HHVubmB8VTJuvpqJDUKQD8nJltb32q/pBw9H0YydVD5Y1uDOiB13Etp8PQ+psPoKaUKYUAnYjl3/Ot8UakblaKR1KP/SzgRBgBFbZPQsJTHLrvVrJ9xWQQRuyIXBia3b98k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=RLHWwYCd; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=ZPcV2yqH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="RLHWwYCd"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ZPcV2yqH" From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1790955229; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=n2LN/j089HOizN1MoojMoOcOlZAfWpfpx4ZfjpRHkag=; b=RLHWwYCd1ch/QbmMtJXvir2OlrLSP6muF8LGca3vEhcBYYU2BTxuWjaEidhBMs9IaWckgi 1vV0kvMLTR+BUwahc6h/ViE8Eo9QcRyA92ZgtE65NzpnxW+W5as6Q9z7eVgTw1NEX9XsU7 TzEpjtdji0VHdWVog3I9Dc87y/1DlYjRVi4sSGwoetnnuSsKjrMSSBbHwZ/jmK/ZWYofGM 9Cwb+H3HsoSeFQigPG3dV+AoSKN+qcykrvf4W/mhHmt0syegG2/8j9BnW19k7ZaBczwnOj 3mpcE9Hb0HTJJDD6Cemk1SW2wGxTrAMoB7aE5X1Pc/ztMT6bypTYCv6bsmNQyQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1790955229; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=n2LN/j089HOizN1MoojMoOcOlZAfWpfpx4ZfjpRHkag=; b=ZPcV2yqHfz9hmZkQpxkfNhq1OpMWRzsaegF4RUQlPqUbxKDu+ZLL+MDcxeR2f+mDgBTbi1 gfiMxtainsChDNAw== To: Gabriele Monaco , Steven Rostedt , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Ogness Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] rv/rtapp/wakeup: Use "rv_this" the rv_monitor variable In-Reply-To: References: <20261001044218.3508990-1-namcao@linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 17:33:48 +0200 Message-ID: <874if415ib.fsf@yellow.woof> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Gabriele Monaco writes: > d9e4c61a12dd was introduced in the same pull request but after introducing the > wakeup monitor. > So for me that's the commit that is "broken" (should have accounted for wakeup): > > Fixes: d9e4c61a12dd ("rv: Use generic rv_this for the rv_monitor variable in > LTL") Sorry, I was lost in the sick land, and now see you already opened the PR. But yes, I agree that the commit applied later should be in Fixes:. Nam