From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>,
Wang Han <wanghan@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org,
tabba@google.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
ljs@kernel.org, itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map (new data structure)
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:54:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ig55u5h.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46342b48-550e-42c1-9d9f-e800c72269c2@linux.alibaba.com>
On Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:01:24 +0100,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/3/26 9:28 PM, Wei-Lin Chang wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 08:43:35AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:35:00 +0100,
> >> Wang Han <wanghan@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Wei-Lin,
> >>>
> >>> I tested this series on a Yitian 710 system with an ARM Neoverse-N2 CPU
> >>> (128 CPUs, 2 NUMA nodes).
> >>>
> >>> Test environment
> >>> ----------------
> >>>
> >>> L0 kernel: Linux v7.2-rc6
> >>> L1 guest: Ubuntu 26.04 LTS, kernel 7.0.0-27-generic (aarch64)
> >>> QEMU: 10.2.3
> >>>
> >>> L0 NUMA balancing was enabled (`/proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing=1`).
> >>> The host was booted with `kvm_arm.mode=nested`.
> >>>
> >>> This series fixes a functional hang that is exposed when NUMA balancing is
> >>> enabled. The previous nested stage-2 unmap path is too slow for this
> >>> workload, making the performance problem user-visible: NUMA balancing can
> >>> leave the L1 guest unable to make progress and eventually hang during boot.
> >>>
> >>> The L1 was started with 8 vCPUs and 32 GiB of RAM using:
> >>>
> >>> qemu-system-aarch64 -smp 8 -m 32G \
> >>> -machine virt,accel=kvm,gic-version=3,virtualization=on \
> >>> -cpu host -nographic -enable-kvm \
> >>> -drive if=pflash,format=raw,readonly=on,file=pflash0_bak.img \
> >>> -drive if=pflash,format=raw,file=pflash1_bak.img \
> >>> -drive file=./ubuntu-vm.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio,cache=none,aio=native \
> >>> -nic user,model=virtio-net-pci,hostfwd=tcp::11234-:22 \
> >>> -serial mon:stdio
> >>>
> >>
> >> Puzzling. If you are only running an L1 in VHE mode, there is no
> >> shadow S2, and therefore nothing to unmap. For shadow S2s to be built
> >> and affect the MMU notifiers, you need to run an L2.
> >
> > I was thinking the same at first, but realized even with L1 in VHE mode
> > there is a small period of time where L1 runs in its EL1 during boot, so
> > one nested MMU will become valid for each vCPU. That causes
> > kvm_nested_s2_unmap() to iterate through the entire IPA space 8 times
> > (-smp 8).
> >
> > What I am curious about is whether one single notifier unmap is enough
> > to hang L1, or were there multiple notifier unmaps.
> >
> > QEMU with -machine virt uses 40 IPA bits only, unmapping that takes:
> > 1024 (4KB pages, unmapping 1GB per iteration)
> > 32768 (16KB pages, unmapping 32MB per iteration)
> > 2048 (64KB pages, unmapping 512MB per iteration)
> > iterations for each page size. There aren't many mappings in each
> > iteration too. Does this really take that long on real hardware (even if
> > this must be done 8 times)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wei-Lin Chang
> >
> >>
> >> So what are your actual test conditions?
> >>
> >> M.
> >>
>
> Hi, Wei-Lin and Marc,
>
> I was able to reproduce this issue and capture ftrace evidence that confirms
> the root cause. Below is the analysis, trace log, and timing data.
[...]
> Each set_migration_pte line is a single-page NUMA migration. Yet each
> migration triggers one full kvm_nested_s2_unmap() that takes 877 ms.
And why is it taking so long? It should be *empty* after the first
iteration.
[...]
> ## Conclusion
>
> The root cause is confirmed: kvm_nested_s2_unmap() performs a full IPA space
> unmap in the MMU notifier path instead of unmapping only the affected
> GPA/CPAI range. The interval-tree-based precise range unmap approach is the
> right fix.
No. This just indicates that this is papering over a bigger problem,
and your AI is jumping to conclusions.
> Please consider applying the patch that replaces the full unmap with
> kvm_nested_unmap_cipa_range() to avoid scanning the entire nested stage-2
> page table on every NUMA migration.
Not until we get to the bottom of this issue.
M.
--
Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 20:50 Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] KVM: arm64: Use a variable for the canonical IPA in kvm_s2_fault_map() Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce guest stage-2 tracking structures Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-14 1:04 ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-08-14 10:42 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-16 22:01 ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping creation Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping removal Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid full shadow stage-2 unmap Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_unmap_gfn_range() with common variables Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-12 2:12 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map (new data structure) Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-02 16:35 ` Wang Han
2026-09-03 7:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-03 13:28 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-04 7:01 ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-04 7:54 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-09-05 15:35 ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-04 7:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-04 11:37 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-04 22:42 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-05 13:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-05 15:49 ` Shuai Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874ig55u5h.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=wanghan@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®