From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE08A1EA84; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 22:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765234208; cv=none; b=DIZX+DM+eZMlNfZsETsv/a5hN5CqtU8BYtrpq2vK+kQlLOfYLF1iWF3Kj5YE86EKwKdrJOamqk+K0KQ1IMFGPLOYURaZ/Ws9X9ooYhnA/tW+CIyEsluxEXAVjkeOIj3FsL9gkvV1RNfhS1GeaF6z3AcA6HUKNm6Xswwf5tJYTuo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765234208; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7Qk/GkOSLi25v6Yi+CXCVB7353ZUjYmxGf/24d79eis=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ApLIe6rwLJvr0Q96lS4lcxuZqMKCuaJ4BWMCoIXbdMJKHA2WCLrsQvYwzdhwLSZorPTgsoh1GET1rz8S+4NqAXDybjpdcdGubjoULmlOWVxu6GMRnxaDjcbhOmzMo3hlzMgCtOSdemgwMltsnPwVffk30ZwlP8jtd5c7hlz1nCc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=gcJohGoK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="gcJohGoK" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 518DB40B2F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1765234205; bh=0ei90r1//lD02GYBuRpo2ooOypjPZ16AdOrYC7KM2ik=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=gcJohGoKkGIW93eMJaPkVjV+hirGNjuoTjyq8gn357PRkLjDXKevCHETW58tG7Uav AxuUecXbvdBpFfxJrn2zGvTVTTQUyUEFTy2M6YPlgvXMIZgpplypq7dwGuZTNllYK+ cGzF+et+Z/1P1QT+8+YUEYnrIHVDkoUugb9O19xzx30FIJUf82J7CY6UTCbl3E2eN3 ftcvCidsWuwu6hNL2hhTOGjakzEPxMPka9NMUWRhp3EYkND6JJ38ZQnrwuLtN5JJ/E I5YRGNw5v3BBI8rmiprcOjsWA2sQ4plYWrkOsUu8uogBh/allfmRC/GwCj0Jxk8HkF GYNRbcHX8DD7Q== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 518DB40B2F; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 22:50:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Bagas Sanjaya , Swaraj Gaikwad , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" Cc: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, david.hunter.linux@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: x86/boot: Fix malformed table in boot.rst In-Reply-To: References: <20251208210113.24057-1-swarajgaikwad1925@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 15:50:02 -0700 Message-ID: <874iq0fv1h.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Bagas Sanjaya writes: > I'd like to instead write the patch description as (more concise): The original was indeed on the verbose side, but please (for the nth time) resist the temptation to tell other contributors what to do. > x86 maintainers: please route this patch through x86/urgent branch. Seriously, Bagas? I think we can figure out how to get this patch applied. jon