From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v5 15/17] printk: Implement legacy printer kthread for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:30:57 +0206 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874j6wke6e.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZtcRZpLjCjWeC4nG@pathway.suse.cz>
On 2024-09-03, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
>> +static bool legacy_kthread_should_wakeup(void)
>> +{
>> + struct console_flush_type ft;
>> + struct console *con;
>> + bool ret = false;
>> + int cookie;
>> +
>> + if (kthread_should_stop())
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + printk_get_console_flush_type(&ft);
>> +
>> + cookie = console_srcu_read_lock();
>> + for_each_console_srcu(con) {
>> + short flags = console_srcu_read_flags(con);
>> + u64 printk_seq;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The legacy printer thread is only for legacy consoles when
>> + * the nbcon consoles have their printer threads.
>> + */
>> + if ((flags & CON_NBCON) && ft.nbcon_offload)
>> + continue;
>
> I am still scratching my head about the fact that the legacy loop
> probably should not handle the nbcon consoles also when
> printk_get_console_flush_type() returns ft.nbcon_atomic().
The legacy loop kthread should never handle nbcon consoles unless a boot
console is registered. So it really needs to be:
if ((flags & CON_NBCON) && (ft.nbcon_offload || ft.nbcon_atomic))
> We probably does not have to take care of it here because this
> code is called only when the legacy kthread is running.
> It means that nbcon consoles should have their kthreads as well
> when they can be handled outside the legacy loop. I mean
> that we should never see ft.nbcon_atomic set here.
Remember that the nbcon kthreads are stopped on shutdown/reboot. For
those final messages, ft.nbcon_atomic=1. The legacy loop kthread should
not handled those printings.
> Sigh, the logic is so complicated.
It takes some getting used to. But I feel like the responsibilities and
transitions are clearer now than ever before.
>> --- a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
>> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
>> @@ -44,7 +44,9 @@ bool is_printk_legacy_deferred(void)
>> * The per-CPU variable @printk_context can be read safely in any
>> * context. CPU migration is always disabled when set.
>> */
>> - return (this_cpu_read(printk_context) || in_nmi());
>> + return (force_legacy_kthread() ||
>
> This is not correct when used in panic(). force_legacy_kthread()
> is not a reason for offload in that case.
If force_legacy_kthread() is true, legacy printing is _ALWAYS_ offloaded
except as a "hope and pray" last attempt via
console_flush_on_panic(). That is a requirement of PREEMPT_RT.
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-03 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 15:28 [PATCH printk v5 00/17] add threaded printing + the rest John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 01/17] printk: nbcon: Add function for printers to reacquire ownership John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 02/17] printk: Fail pr_flush() if before SYSTEM_SCHEDULING John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 03/17] printk: Flush console on unregister_console() John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 04/17] printk: nbcon: Add context to usable() and emit() John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 05/17] printk: nbcon: Init @nbcon_seq to highest possible John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 06/17] printk: nbcon: Introduce printer kthreads John Ogness
2024-09-02 14:19 ` Petr Mladek
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 07/17] printk: nbcon: Relocate nbcon_atomic_emit_one() John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 08/17] printk: nbcon: Use thread callback if in task context for legacy John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 09/17] printk: nbcon: Rely on kthreads for normal operation John Ogness
2024-09-03 10:10 ` Petr Mladek
2024-09-03 11:50 ` John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 10/17] printk: Provide helper for message prepending John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 11/17] printk: nbcon: Show replay message on takeover John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 12/17] proc: consoles: Add notation to c_start/c_stop John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 13/17] proc: Add nbcon support for /proc/consoles John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 14/17] tty: sysfs: Add nbcon support for 'active' John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 15/17] printk: Implement legacy printer kthread for PREEMPT_RT John Ogness
2024-09-03 13:38 ` Petr Mladek
2024-09-03 14:24 ` John Ogness [this message]
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 16/17] printk: nbcon: Assign nice -20 for printing threads John Ogness
2024-08-30 15:29 ` [PATCH printk v5 17/17] printk: Avoid false positive lockdep report for legacy printing John Ogness
2024-09-03 14:53 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874j6wke6e.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®