From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE29C19425 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4554F23D37 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730177AbgLIVE2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:04:28 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:49396 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727013AbgLIVE2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:04:28 -0500 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1607547826; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vH7YX6Q8hF6owa+mw8R0RFamxdvfP3I6NKP6vgDZYXk=; b=4dfcI2KN69tAMiPB1RlzL+VJZBM9MiERByCXwyO77yIXJSfgKBurVkcVv/1WUd35OqMzx6 +pOlgB5wRy4xEGOOepk2c4S5oXiKY4juJE+1UQWI7G8pNUuIxv/ltZSAGNiWUOg7wJVXYy IcofZHjaAmAOrUcOjze6mBHLF7ALWMq+hQSJxRIdd1OSbrQr+zkX8EBI3vkbyBshl6Gf7w zOgK8/ZzJx5gNn58BdUxsRBZ5Or3fntZgYXFITjFwuzr22F9yJiJeJ/hDn0aGoIqvBSc78 wrVSsSrY2OzpSbZyaCZiiiIIJkxyrAFDFPgcPIaJ/TUYnfLbVTP9HTN0ylNqAA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1607547826; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vH7YX6Q8hF6owa+mw8R0RFamxdvfP3I6NKP6vgDZYXk=; b=Y/yO9t+Cv1wex1RlcyfpDs0lGoIkdsSOId+znpJt0SIpjdwY4lFZTBM1lsCIKwK1UJn79A foY/KqON7X1HpbBQ== To: Juergen Gross , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org, Juergen Gross , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Boris Ostrovsky , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] x86/xen: use specific Xen pv interrupt entry for DF In-Reply-To: <20201120114630.13552-3-jgross@suse.com> References: <20201120114630.13552-1-jgross@suse.com> <20201120114630.13552-3-jgross@suse.com> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 22:03:45 +0100 Message-ID: <874kkulmj2.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 20 2020 at 12:46, Juergen Gross wrote: > Xen PV guests don't use IST. For double fault interrupts switch to > the same model as NMI. > > Correct a typo in a comment while copying it. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner