From: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, broonie@kernel.org,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
deepa.kernel@gmail.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com, lucien xin <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] mqueue: fix IPC namespace use-after-free
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:59:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874lomhcwb.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171219153225.GA14771@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (Al Viro's message of "Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:32:25 +0000")
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:48:19AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:14:40AM +0100, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
>> > mqueue_evict_inode() doesn't access the ipc namespace if it was
>> > already freed. It can happen if in a new IPC namespace the inode was
>> > created without a prior mq_open() which creates the vfsmount used to
>> > access the superblock from mq_clear_sbinfo().
>> >
>> > Keep a direct pointer to the superblock used by the inodes so we can
>> > correctly reset the reference to the IPC namespace being destroyed.
>> >
>> > Bug introduced with 9c583773d03633 ("ipc, mqueue: lazy call
>> > kern_mount_data in new namespaces")
>>
>> And just what will happen in the same scenario if you mount the damn
>> thing in userland without ever calling mq_open(), touch a file there,
>> then unmount and then leave the ipc namespace?
>
> FWIW, the real solution would be to have userland mounts trigger the creation
> of internal one, same as mq_open() would. Something along these lines
> (completely untested, on top of vfs.git#for-next). Care to give it some
> beating?
thanks for the patch. It seems to work after this minor fixup on top of
it:
diff --git a/ipc/mqueue.c b/ipc/mqueue.c
index 30327e201571..636989a44fae 100644
--- a/ipc/mqueue.c
+++ b/ipc/mqueue.c
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static struct vfsmount *mq_internal_mount(void)
spin_unlock(&mq_lock);
if (!IS_ERR(m))
kern_unmount(m);
- return ns->mq_mnt;
+ return ns->mq_mnt;
}
if (!IS_ERR(m))
ns->mq_mnt = m;
@@ -1560,6 +1560,7 @@ static struct file_system_type mqueue_fs_type = {
int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
{
+ ns->mq_mnt = NULL;
ns->mq_queues_count = 0;
ns->mq_queues_max = DFLT_QUEUESMAX;
ns->mq_msg_max = DFLT_MSGMAX;
The only issue I've seen with my version is that if I do:
# unshare -im /bin/sh
# mount -t mqueue mqueue /dev/mqueue
# touch /dev/mqueue/foo
# umount /dev/mqueue
# mount -t mqueue mqueue /dev/mqueue
then /dev/mqueue/foo doesn't exist at this point. Your patch does not
have this problem and /dev/mqueue/foo is again accessible after the
second mount.
Regards,
Giuseppe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-19 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-19 10:14 Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-12-19 11:48 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 15:32 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 15:44 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 16:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-12-19 17:02 ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-12-19 16:59 ` Giuseppe Scrivano [this message]
2017-12-19 18:40 ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-12-19 20:14 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 21:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-12-19 22:40 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 23:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-12-21 19:19 ` Giuseppe Scrivano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874lomhcwb.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=gscrivan@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome