mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	alexander.deucher@amd.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	deepa.kernel@gmail.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com, lucien xin <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] mqueue: fix IPC namespace use-after-free
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:59:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874lomhcwb.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171219153225.GA14771@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (Al Viro's message of "Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:32:25 +0000")

Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> writes:

> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:48:19AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:14:40AM +0100, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
>> > mqueue_evict_inode() doesn't access the ipc namespace if it was
>> > already freed.  It can happen if in a new IPC namespace the inode was
>> > created without a prior mq_open() which creates the vfsmount used to
>> > access the superblock from mq_clear_sbinfo().
>> > 
>> > Keep a direct pointer to the superblock used by the inodes so we can
>> > correctly reset the reference to the IPC namespace being destroyed.
>> > 
>> > Bug introduced with 9c583773d03633 ("ipc, mqueue: lazy call
>> > kern_mount_data in new namespaces")
>> 
>> And just what will happen in the same scenario if you mount the damn
>> thing in userland without ever calling mq_open(), touch a file there,
>> then unmount and then leave the ipc namespace?
>
> FWIW, the real solution would be to have userland mounts trigger the creation
> of internal one, same as mq_open() would.  Something along these lines
> (completely untested, on top of vfs.git#for-next).  Care to give it some
> beating?

thanks for the patch.  It seems to work after this minor fixup on top of
it:

diff --git a/ipc/mqueue.c b/ipc/mqueue.c
index 30327e201571..636989a44fae 100644
--- a/ipc/mqueue.c
+++ b/ipc/mqueue.c
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static struct vfsmount *mq_internal_mount(void)
 		spin_unlock(&mq_lock);
 		if (!IS_ERR(m))
 			kern_unmount(m);
-			return ns->mq_mnt;
+		return ns->mq_mnt;
 	}
 	if (!IS_ERR(m))
 		ns->mq_mnt = m;
@@ -1560,6 +1560,7 @@ static struct file_system_type mqueue_fs_type = {
 
 int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
 {
+	ns->mq_mnt           = NULL;
 	ns->mq_queues_count  = 0;
 	ns->mq_queues_max    = DFLT_QUEUESMAX;
 	ns->mq_msg_max       = DFLT_MSGMAX;


The only issue I've seen with my version is that if I do:

# unshare -im /bin/sh
# mount -t mqueue mqueue /dev/mqueue
# touch /dev/mqueue/foo
# umount /dev/mqueue
# mount -t mqueue mqueue /dev/mqueue

then /dev/mqueue/foo doesn't exist at this point.  Your patch does not
have this problem and /dev/mqueue/foo is again accessible after the
second mount.

Regards,
Giuseppe

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-19 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-19 10:14 Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-12-19 11:48 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 15:32   ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 15:44     ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 16:31       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-12-19 17:02         ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-12-19 16:59     ` Giuseppe Scrivano [this message]
2017-12-19 18:40       ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-12-19 20:14         ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 21:49           ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-12-19 22:40             ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 23:36               ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-12-21 19:19           ` Giuseppe Scrivano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874lomhcwb.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=gscrivan@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome