From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752127AbdJYVzU (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:55:20 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45566 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751837AbdJYVzS (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:55:18 -0400
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:55:06 +1100
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Assorted cleanups for staging/.../lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1710242320020.20646@casper.infradead.org>
References: <150871988297.3340.4522589460981284121.stgit@noble> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1710242320020.20646@casper.infradead.org>
Message-ID: <874lqmevut.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
        micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 24 2017, James Simmons wrote:

>> This file contains quite a bit of dead code and unused variables.
>> This patch series cleans it up in various ways.
>> It should change behaviour at all, just code
>> readability/maintainabilty.
>>=20
>> I sent the back in July but got not response, possibly because there
>> were included with other patches which caused a distraction.
>> So here they are by themselves.
>
> Thanks for separating them out. I will give them a spin.
>

Thanks.  I have a growing series of cleanups (43 at present, including
these and the namei/dcache patches).  Is posting them here the best
approach?  I assume I should keep them in well-defined groups.  Should I
wait for one set to be merged before sending more, or should I just send
them when I think they are ready and you (or others) will look at them
as time permits.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEG8Yp69OQ2HB7X0l6Oeye3VZigbkFAlnxCDwACgkQOeye3VZi
gbnUkBAAmKD09azs4BYcL++xMzQ3RcmEV7hI6tb8r5fnLTdYXWKgVVIEYLWW/ha7
o4sw3ZeOztzFx81KG+GDPevjgzFoMswlRsVqIrPIOi1mzZ/FzT93bnOrbAOyhtql
JPt83M5ci93LFlf4ijI3+xEMgI06h4w+Bk0AEM0bkiczE2Vxg0eXE6aMl3WWZGTx
e79G1TYPBbM5T9FBlqoc9TECyCu1AVxafQvb7Kv7XkFsnErfdCTn+DO5xO+OFh1w
nt9M3vuyz3sbWaxsBRxcYLFly8IA/WBJ/Wpp5gvE05cvnaVnfOWFbFmGfXi8S2Sf
zau1iPYMAp7+iErhI5fBENd3ueXMyKD29mw5AivaGZXOpvytVCln3iyOU0y3g/Ma
zKQmv1LQfjIHS9QK1AWPi7EyaPCxfofKhnwkVTLKrIEaUu6tq+CftRhEk8NIuiWv
7DNSrfBidDYqL/h8+Y3Ut9QEZtrGEv7Kaw4ZLb8aJlvIKg+mTZVMWiVW1PyzEHzd
04KUS3+viqTicNjoPG+CG9EZU7j+Y+Jm+EOvVwXJOSzjbVSDKeBg/BqBZc0Kb4C6
orhFT1qYtWd/dveJxZdLuyJWwYH972jMaBCxlvvA+t4nogCa0sexfG6kiFn0OFSJ
3wo+g2JfqOXkUmjMuZ1Q3fSA4x7Dhoq/lSV0D9Uk9bfIxEmWONk=
=cfZl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--