From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
jeyu@redhat.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"paulus\@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/reloc64: add support for 32-bit CRC pseudo-symbols
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:39:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874m2ooumq.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8g=qgOg0Q5J7tFu0uBUFTUXdVQ+84N45oZseG3vTm0Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> writes:
> On 25 November 2016 at 11:29, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>> Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>> [ 7.607687] kvm: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
>> [ 7.846799] virtio: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
>> [ 22.012615] crc32c_vpmsum: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
>> [ 22.012959] libcrc32c: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
>>
>
> Sigh. I suppose your modversions fixes are queued for v4.10? It's
> probably best to revisit this after the v4.10 merge window closes
> then, just to make sure I'm not aiming for a moving target.
Actually they were merged into 4.9-rc7 ish.
But I'm still seeing the same as above with this series rebased on top
of that, and I'm a bit short on time to debug it ATM.
So during the 4.10 cycle is probably the best we can hope for, sorry.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-01 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-27 16:27 [PATCH v3 0/3] modversions: Fix CRC mangling under CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-27 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] powerpc/reloc32: fix corrupted modversion CRCs Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-28 10:27 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-10-27 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/reloc64: add support for 32-bit CRC pseudo-symbols Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-25 11:29 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-11-25 12:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-12-01 9:39 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2016-12-01 9:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-12-01 16:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-27 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] modversions: treat symbol CRCs as 32 bit quantities on 64 bit archs Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-04 9:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] modversions: Fix CRC mangling under CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-10 4:22 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-11-15 9:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-25 8:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-25 11:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-11-16 19:23 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-11-16 20:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874m2ooumq.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®