From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752264AbcFVR5G (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:57:06 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:40384 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750758AbcFVR5D (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:57:03 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Phil Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, References: <576A8873.50809@gmx.ch> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:44:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <576A8873.50809@gmx.ch> (Phil's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:45:39 +0200") Message-ID: <874m8lqfsb.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1bFmOa-0006w2-RA;;;mid=<874m8lqfsb.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.3.204.119;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18S6FocNF+Hz05IWXFK5gSzZjsi5tN6dYQ= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.204.119 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Phil X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 563 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.3 (0.8%), b_tie_ro: 3.0 (0.5%), parse: 1.10 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 28 (5.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.76 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 10 (1.8%), tests_pri_-950: 2.1 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.70 (0.3%), tests_pri_-400: 24 (4.3%), check_bayes: 22 (4.0%), b_tokenize: 7 (1.3%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.0%), b_comp_prob: 3.0 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.1 (0.6%), b_finish: 0.97 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 223 (39.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.83 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 5 (1.0%), tests_pri_500: 262 (46.6%), poll_dns_idle: 250 (44.5%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: rstpd implementation X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Phil writes: > Hi, > > When looking for an RSTP daemon I found Stephen Hemminger's > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shemminger/rstp.git > > with it's last commit from October 2011. > > Is this implementation still in good use by anybody - or has it been > replaced/superseded by another implementation? I don't know and when you get into user space daemons they aren't much talked about on the kernel lists. That said you will likely fair better on the netdev list (cc'd). Eric