From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933656Ab1JDUTZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:19:25 -0400 Received: from depni.sinp.msu.ru ([213.131.7.21]:35799 "EHLO depni.sinp.msu.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933567Ab1JDUTY (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:19:24 -0400 From: Serge Belyshev To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Joe Perches , starlight@binnacle.cx, Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev , Willy Tarreau , Peter Zijlstra , Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: big picture UDP/IP performance question re 2.6.18 -> 2.6.32 References: <6.2.5.6.2.20111003112108.03a83a28@binnacle.cx> <1317757118.3580.24.camel@Joe-Laptop> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:49:25 +0400 In-Reply-To: (Christoph Lameter's message of "Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:42:28 -0500 (CDT)") Message-ID: <874nzo35bu.fsf@depni.sinp.msu.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter writes: > No. BFS has no NUMA support. BFS has NUMA support since v0.300, 1st oct. 2009.