From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] fat: Batched discard support for fat
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:51:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874o0xlb9p.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH9JG2UDKD-tZPo-OiQmiheNvPqPE2o_cTEbc9M9Uu02HB6hcw@mail.gmail.com> (Kyungmin Park's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:02:53 +0900")
Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> writes:
> Hi Ogawa,
Hi,
> Do you still object to merge batched discard support on fat?
>
> If the current batched discard concept doesn't changed, it can't merge it?
I'm not blaming "concept". I'm saying current implements (and due to
current interface confusion) is confusing and makes userland hard to use it.
I really think I explained all my concerns and current implement
confusion.
Last time I checked, those implementations had even the different error
code at EOF. How can I say your implement will work without knowing
right implement?
Again, it is reason, and I'm not blaming "concept" or your implement
itself.
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-31 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-28 10:34 Kyungmin Park
2011-03-29 5:04 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-03-29 5:11 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-03-29 6:37 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-03-29 6:42 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-03-29 7:28 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-03-30 13:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-30 13:50 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-30 13:58 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-03-30 14:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-30 14:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-30 14:44 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-03-30 15:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-24 1:18 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-05-24 4:47 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-05-24 5:21 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-05-24 6:39 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-05-24 6:55 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-05-24 7:32 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-05-24 8:54 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-05-24 9:44 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-05-24 9:25 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-24 10:07 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-05-24 10:44 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-24 11:14 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-05-24 11:32 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-24 12:19 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-05-24 13:30 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-24 14:19 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-08-31 13:02 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-08-31 17:51 ` OGAWA Hirofumi [this message]
2011-10-05 14:38 ` Lukas Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874o0xlb9p.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp \
--to=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=kmpark@infradead.org \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome