Jens Axboe writes: > On Sat, Feb 27 2010, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: >> merge_bvec_fn() returns bvec->bv_len on success. So we have to check >> against this value. But in case of fs_optimization merge we compare >> with wrong value. This patch must be included in >> b428cd6da7e6559aca69aa2e3a526037d3f20403 >> But accidentally i've forgot to add this in the initial patch. >> To make things straight let's replace all such checks. >> In fact this makes code easy to understand. > > Agree, applied. Ohh.. as you already know this patch break dm-layer. Sorry. This is because dm->merge may return more than requested. So correct check must test against less what requested. Correct patch attached.