From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 02:58:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ovws94s.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> (raw)
Hi,
I've noticed that the last modification times of our RRD files got
stuck after upgrading from 2.6.24 to 2.6.26 (Debian Etch -> Lenny).
It has some literature, most notably kernel bug #2645, but that's
closed long ago and the resulting patch
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/22/370 is present in my kernel. Still,
the test program (version 3 from the bug report) gives failures:
$ ./mmap_test junk
Modifying junk...
Flushing data using sync()...
Failure: time not changed.
Not modifying junk...
Flushing data using msync()...
Success: time not changed.
Not modifying junk...
Flushing data using fsync()...
Success: time not changed.
Modifying junk...
Flushing data using msync()...
Failure: time not changed.
Modifying junk...
Flushing data using fsync()...
Failure: time not changed.
Is this as expected? I reckon the bug wasn't solved fully, but it
seems to be worse that that.
I don't know if it's related or not, but another anomaly appeared
after the upgrade: minutes-long remount times. The machine always was
under a fair load (10), but mount /usr -oremount,rw never took
noticeable time. The IO load pushes two other filesystems. Now
strace -tt shows:
[...]
01:24:08.463813 stat64("/sbin/mount.xfs", 0xbfa40eb0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
01:24:08.463904 mount("/dev/mapper/noc7-usr", "/usr", 0x894a2c8, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_NODEV|MS_REMOUNT, NULL) = 0
01:26:58.705387 readlink("/dev", 0xbfa3ef3b, 4096) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
[...]
After this, remount ro and rw again are quick for some time.
I can not easily test newer kernels in this setup, so thought to ask
around before delving into it further. Is this a known problem
perhaps? Does it ring any bells? If already fixed, can the fix be
backported to 2.6.26 with reasonable effort? If not, how can I best
help investigate this?
--
Thanks,
Feri.
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-08 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-08 0:58 Ferenc Wagner [this message]
2009-05-12 12:32 ` mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26 and up Ferenc Wagner
2009-05-12 15:37 ` Ray Lee
2009-05-12 15:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-15 16:40 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-05-15 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-18 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-22 17:52 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-09-25 12:47 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-09-26 13:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-15 0:08 ` Ferenc Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874ovws94s.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu \
--to=wferi@niif.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®