From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: "Naman Jain" <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
"Dexuan Cui" <decui@microsoft.com>,
"Long Li" <longli@microsoft.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com>,
Aditya Garg <gargaditya@linux.microsoft.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/irq, iommu/amd, PCI: Drop redundant irq_retrigger inits
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:24:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875x0e204j.ffs@fw13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810090716.2325295-4-namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
On Mon, Aug 10 2026 at 09:07, Naman Jain wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irqd, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> * IRR.
> */
> if (lapic_vector_set_in_irr(cfg->vector))
> - irq_data_get_irq_chip(irqd)->irq_retrigger(irqd);
> + irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy(irqd);
That's broken because irqd points at the vector domain already, so there
is no parent and nothing gets retriggered.
Let's look at the hierarchy when interrupt remapping is enabled:
| --- [DMAR]
[VECTOR] --- | | -- [IOAPIC]
| --- [REMAP] ---| -- [HPET]
| -- [DEVICE MSI]
All outer domains have .irq_set_affinity = msi_domain_set_affinity,
which does:
msi_domain_set_affinity(irqdata, ....)
irqdata->parent->irq_set_affinity(irqdata->parent, ....);
In that case msi_set_affinity() is only reachable for the DMAR domain
and all others (IOAPIC, HPET, DEVICE MSI) end up in the REMAP domain
which handles irq_set_affinity and never ends up in the above code.
In the non-remapping case:
| -- [IOAPIC]
[VECTOR] --- | -- [HPET]
| -- [DEVICE MSI]
In this case the vector domain is the MSI parent domain for all of them
and all outer domains will end up in msi_set_affinity() via
msi_domain_set_affinity().
In any case 'irqd' in msi_set_affinity() will always point to the vector
domain and therefore the exiting code is correct and can't be changed to
retrigger hierarchy as that would see irqd->parent == NULL and do
nothing. Neither will adding a conditional there do anything useful
because the vector domain always has the retrigger callback set.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 9:07 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/irq: Fix lost interrupts on CPU hot-unplug for Hyper-V PCI/MSI Naman Jain
2026-08-10 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip Naman Jain
2026-08-17 3:38 ` Michael Kelley
2026-08-17 12:15 ` Naman Jain
2026-08-17 15:30 ` Naman Jain
2026-08-17 17:14 ` Michael Kelley
2026-08-18 5:10 ` Michael Kelley
2026-08-24 0:22 ` Wei Liu
2026-08-10 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/irq: Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() in fixup_irqs() Naman Jain
2026-08-18 5:10 ` Michael Kelley
2026-08-18 7:31 ` Naman Jain
2026-08-19 15:59 ` Michael Kelley
2026-08-20 4:47 ` Naman Jain
2026-08-20 4:53 ` Michael Kelley
2026-09-09 9:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-08-10 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/irq, iommu/amd, PCI: Drop redundant irq_retrigger inits Naman Jain
2026-08-18 5:10 ` Michael Kelley
2026-08-18 7:31 ` Naman Jain
2026-09-09 10:24 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-09-10 18:51 ` Michael Kelley
2026-09-11 8:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-09-11 16:32 ` Michael Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875x0e204j.ffs@fw13 \
--to=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=gargaditya@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®