mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: richard@nod.at,  vigneshr@ti.com,  linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: bcm47xxnflash: Add error handling for bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_ctl_cmd()
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 08:51:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xjgihwr.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250405143348.2477-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn> (Wentao Liang's message of "Sat, 5 Apr 2025 22:33:47 +0800")

Hello Liang,

On 05/04/2025 at 22:33:47 +08, Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:

> The bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_cmd_ctrl() calls
> bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_ctl_cmd() without printing error message. A
> proper implementation can be found in
> bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_write().

This is a problem with cmd_ctrl, but this interface has been deprecated
~5y ago and people encouraged to transition to ->exec_op(). Did you
personally experience issues with that or is this just code analysis? If
you are actually using this driver, I'd highly suggest to update the
driver.

> Add error log to the bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_ctl_cmd() to prevent
> silent failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/bcm47xxnflash/ops_bcm4706.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/bcm47xxnflash/ops_bcm4706.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/bcm47xxnflash/ops_bcm4706.c
> index 6487dfc64258..c89129588bb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/bcm47xxnflash/ops_bcm4706.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/bcm47xxnflash/ops_bcm4706.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ static void bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_cmd_ctrl(struct nand_chip *nand_chip,
>  	if (cmd != NAND_CMD_RESET)
>  		code |= NCTL_CSA;
>  
> -	bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_ctl_cmd(b47n->cc, code);
> +	if (bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_ctl_cmd(b47n->cc, code))
> +		pr_err("%s ctl_cmd didn't work!\n", __func__);

dev_err() is probably better
__func__ is not needed
If we want to make it a bit usable, I'd say that the return code shall
be there as well.

>  }
>  
>  /* Default nand_select_chip calls cmd_ctrl, which is not used in BCM4706 */

Thanks,
Miquèl


      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-07  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-05 14:33 Wentao Liang
2025-04-07  6:51 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875xjgihwr.fsf@bootlin.com \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®