From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A5EC433B4 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 00:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7F360E09 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 00:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230113AbhEHAHt (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 20:07:49 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:52620 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229812AbhEHAHs (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 20:07:48 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1620432407; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=spikNF5AN5oMuc3pokCorS5IzQrz0h0g6dQ2lapegZE=; b=3485Z19GmrDBAPEbtuNTd+bhuanx6ega4yes7gtLvEhgYCVj0LaBE+gbJnMLDaZGF+U3Tf uI2v9lh0LWW5Y/ZJD44bvMmCDSHFc3CMGGDUwmktSevdlIPUJPZDQ2MekaPIuMDXL+5Lom vt79JI2wK1zzCGm7n6AbdcyE9ZXXNRJe+jYGYXgbgaNYI0k5DR5/NddTbv+n4jhg4AbDR/ QZ/Z07bq2hUWRrM7a8A9KiL+lZhgdOQphgd/xoweN/zce7FMC6CSHQX6/Z/Nh8BpRv9C7d mkiKo6ioeYkp4pmpT15OBJmCdkGTJxCOvn/ltkuh/6Y6f7yfaJl6Qy/PDT0b3A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1620432407; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=spikNF5AN5oMuc3pokCorS5IzQrz0h0g6dQ2lapegZE=; b=66nyL19bjORicI/Ebg1vY09r9ZJP8HDVOciif6RZf5QYyV0VvSI9ReizNPI19lXd/y8Pi4 G9YwtA6WyuRaDJBg== To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: John Stultz , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] alarmtimer: check RTC features instead of ops In-Reply-To: <87wnsfd7e2.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> References: <20210429214902.2612338-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> <877dkkfdif.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <871rasf8qe.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87wnsfd7e2.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 02:06:47 +0200 Message-ID: <875yzum6lk.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 03 2021 at 20:00, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, May 03 2021 at 17:34, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> On 30/04/2021 10:59:53+0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> I hope this is clearer. > > Yes, that makes sense now! Am I expected to rewrite the changelog or is there going to be a V2 of this? Thanks, tglx