From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CD9C433DF for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367AA248B8 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b="WhFX2fQg" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729879AbgFUKMu (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:12:50 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:48309 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729732AbgFUKMt (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:12:49 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49qSz26L3Vz9sSf; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:12:46 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1592734367; bh=73EbSfvdEUAjZq8zN7sj/qvkEAt7r5fJFhwHZNeTzu0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=WhFX2fQgf6uDTODIOOxw/m/EruopCUcZCSs/OEXJ0WOd0qMcPw6MiLC7IpFFjXlAc 8A2ldVoheZHjDS97QRZaJ4ww7+ZLkwQIBzpj5/JKyDp+khBOoh1illuoGXyLazZhYZ 0+rWo8qRleqFLcNsCgLK+glSwrwtCsGj06469NEkONPvfKuALmKUeqQ0gKPGZbBAPc B1y3xPef5+MWWbkDRx4RkljHxsZdEquDiS+K2X+QWZFEpEhlZyDyMueAGNCPVnaE+1 BYLXJSeZ08/wzor7UBVa746JWY3FieFXDuHagS02YEdPkF0RxLhzlImphatw2h95sr MPBHNE2kSr2PA== From: Michael Ellerman To: Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: linux-arch@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/syscalls: Use the number when building SPU syscall table In-Reply-To: <159248379723.3471720.7761730589256580141.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au> References: <20200616135617.2937252-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> <159248379723.3471720.7761730589256580141.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:13:17 +1000 Message-ID: <875zbkd8w2.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael Ellerman writes: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:56:16 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Currently the macro that inserts entries into the SPU syscall table >> doesn't actually use the "nr" (syscall number) parameter. >> >> This does work, but it relies on the exact right number of syscall >> entries being emitted in order for the syscal numbers to line up with >> the array entries. If for example we had two entries with the same >> syscall number we wouldn't get an error, it would just cause all >> subsequent syscalls to be off by one in the spu_syscall_table. >> >> [...] > > Applied to powerpc/fixes. > > [1/2] powerpc/syscalls: Use the number when building SPU syscall table > https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1497eea68624f6076bf3eaf66baec3771ea04045 > [2/2] powerpc/syscalls: Split SPU-ness out of ABI > https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/35e32a6cb5f694fda54a5f391917e4ceefa0fece Patch 2 dropped. cheers