From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com,
songliubraving@fb.com, eranian@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
megha.dey@intel.com, frederic@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 14:17:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875zqcx8yx.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181010104559.GO5728@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> + // XXX think about exclusive
> + if ((pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE) && group_leader) {
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + goto err_context;
> }
This used to be a problem, because group_leader could have caused
move_group, which could then potentially violate the
exclusive_event_installable() half way through installing siblings onto
the new context (gctx -> ctx). But, with the proposed new order, it's
the same context (ctx), but different epc, which is not a problem; any
potential violations would be caught by
if (!exclusive_event_installable(event, ctx))
that preceeds the move_group block.
It also makes sense that exclusive_event_installable() looks on
ctx->event_list and not epc lists for this exact reason.
In retrospect, we can probably also fix this better in the current code
like:
if (!exclusive_event_installable(event, ctx) ||
!exclusive_event_installable(event, gctx)) /* do -EBUSY */
and get rid of the above restriction to allow grouping "exclusive"
events.
Regards,
--
Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-15 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-10 10:45 Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-11 7:50 ` Song Liu
2018-10-11 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-11 22:37 ` Song Liu
2018-10-12 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-12 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-13 8:31 ` Song Liu
2018-10-16 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-16 16:34 ` Song Liu
2018-10-16 18:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-16 18:24 ` Song Liu
2018-10-12 7:04 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-12 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-15 7:26 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-15 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-15 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-15 17:29 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-15 18:31 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-10-16 6:39 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-16 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-15 22:09 ` Song Liu
2018-10-16 18:28 ` Song Liu
2018-10-17 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-17 16:43 ` Song Liu
2018-10-17 17:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-17 18:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-17 18:57 ` Song Liu
2018-10-16 16:26 ` Mark Rutland
2018-10-16 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-17 8:57 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-17 15:01 ` Alexander Shishkin
2018-10-17 15:58 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-17 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-18 7:05 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-22 13:26 ` Alexander Shishkin
2018-10-23 6:13 ` Song Liu
2018-10-23 6:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-15 11:17 ` Alexander Shishkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875zqcx8yx.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=megha.dey@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®