From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754072AbbIPOCm (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:02:42 -0400 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org ([131.252.210.177]:42088 "EHLO gabe.freedesktop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752306AbbIPOCk (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:02:40 -0400 From: Eric Anholt To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Noralf =?utf-8?Q?Tr=C3=B8nnes?= , tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: bcm2835: Add FIQ support In-Reply-To: <20150914143459.GN21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1434130016-26574-1-git-send-email-noralf@tronnes.org> <87d1zj6fq2.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> <55F5CD80.3020700@tronnes.org> <20150914090853.GF21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87wpvtjcka.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> <20150914143459.GN21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:02:32 -0400 Message-ID: <87613a31jb.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Russell King - ARM Linux writes: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 07:33:09AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: >> So, while FIQ isn't used in upstream, I think it's worthwhile to merge. >> It is another step to bringing the downstream developers into the fold. > > I want to see the code _first_. Until then, I'm sorry, this patch can't > go in. If you just want to see "Yes, GPL-compatible code using this is available", then that is: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/blob/rpi-4.1.y/drivers/usb/host/dwc_otg/dwc_otg_fiq_stub.S https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/blob/rpi-4.1.y/drivers/usb/host/dwc_otg/dwc_otg_fiq_fsm.c If not, I'm curious what exactly is the reason the patch can't go in. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV+XZ5AAoJELXWKTbR/J7ozBgP/iWG1Hg2Qa/FWcE9/U4WI+U+ M71qvFTgAXcNWf+/udCH7sQQX6abfpPuOVRyB/gTrva3KDwbjRFInPIJYfQpcUwi azZdWXxyk0721mBo8AjnrilaEM670YXFAmUeuRnjaoQ0vyyoCWsY2tYqS80vIF97 PPpPj8e4l09K1j37iu/PTxqFb8H7NXNPzGOgKtk1qkBdrYIAuYrcnBQEx2kQ0Db1 VQtR/wg5vN/HDxv8XU2/VECzIlTjFxFWrqfuntDhAIcYx2F1VAZ43Mem58MLOLFW 63hKy406yiZLm5Z3/AwZLBpwLNV7xjiEmfYMBLCK6hQxG6MHGxEZsPHqykks/1GX Lzr1DJeJxGEmvpv1vpZ6cHluWYkwq0o5IsMurDpnHwpwf+Aqm0CM6g44iIQD6ss7 iwp+DRCTqxfQG+I9QSGaviBbaGyLKngHta0nWCS4/djvOpTS07hGIF3TYt9kehyP oEPCgvxDDb6JagGMAGtS7tWU6QP1qZ0obFzGc5bxEz5mvDJHV16sQJFzvfIO5jjV mtSP5NVI9MeDdyYd4UKLACw4X91houLvjTVIfx+PchaOebZ1yHZy7KYL9O0eZz9l OHfJA1FStAaMKYMCyN6tFZz6DBr545h8gW7TAIP5pwfnWAoZcndDM4Pzf3UJuTET aQ7GQRx/5wxludEa0PUR =MQDE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--