From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933531AbbDWLAc (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 07:00:32 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54]:32855 "EHLO mail-la0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932980AbbDWLAa (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 07:00:30 -0400 From: Rasmus Villemoes To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: use -mskip-rax-setup when available Organization: D03 References: <1429532896-10265-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20150420150735.GA10191@pd.tnic> <87k2x64kfn.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20150420204140.GB10149@pd.tnic> X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:x86@kernel.org::Y8tN6lcgqenfLXuE:0000z/X X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:mingo@redhat.com::w8URBHhaTzQ2d0jl:00Izj X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:tglx@linutronix.de::jbZgYvAn56eZRewo:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005fr X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:hpa@zytor.com::tWc5YvCrj0IumK3o:00003G/Y X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:bp@alien8.de::SAg+5euPuQi6L4cv:000004SR+ X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:hjl.tools@gmail.com::W24mfP0dGedcVGoA:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000006EIA X-Hashcash: 1:20:150423:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::BRjlntHC/mRpbj72:0000000000000000000000000000000009Uxj Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:00:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150420204140.GB10149@pd.tnic> (Borislav Petkov's message of "Mon, 20 Apr 2015 22:41:40 +0200") Message-ID: <87618nm7n9.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 20 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:24:44PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> Hadn't seen that, so I wrongly assumed everybody had forgotten about >> it. I don't care about the S-o-b on the trivial Makefile patch, but my >> request for a feature-suggested-by or similar still stands. > > I don't understand what that means. Are you saying, you want the patch > in Mostly this, of course, or the whole thing would have been pointless. > or you want attribution or ...? That would be nice. Rasmus