From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767148AbXDERi0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:38:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767149AbXDERi0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:38:26 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:51275 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767148AbXDERiZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:38:25 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Alan Hourihane Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/01] New FBDev driver for Intel Vermilion Range In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:44:46 BST." <1175769886.10382.29.camel@localhost> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <1175769886.10382.29.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1175794703_8618P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:38:23 -0400 Message-ID: <8776.1175794703@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1175794703_8618P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:44:46 BST, Alan Hourihane said: > Attached is a patch against 2.6.21-rc5 which adds the Intel Vermilion > Range support. One non-technical question here... > +config FB_VERMILION > + tristate "Vermilion support" > + depends on FB && PCI && X86 > + select FB_MODE_HELPERS > + select FB_CFB_FILLRECT > + select FB_CFB_COPYAREA > + select FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT > + help > + This driver supports the Vermilion Range chipset Is 'Vermillion' the project codename, or the name that end users will actually see when hardware ships? Most of the Intel graphics chopsets have been named things like i810, i925, and so on - if the user-visible name is known, that should probably be reflected in the 'tristate' string and help text (FB_VERMILLION in the code is fine by be though). --==_Exmh_1175794703_8618P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFGFTQPcC3lWbTT17ARArRWAJ9f9LyS3sosemmIFVslUDtJTOqCZACgmlX6 SJyj89mJx+Tkyfl7CsknB+Y= =w9UF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1175794703_8618P--