From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4150279CF; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755535962; cv=none; b=bZeG0R88dQZsroQWALESupGKgK3ULT84O67xJi6eTt8VycL7nHDj11kXlK6ZLUwtxLaXXGQjiTY7LceDaAJJEHfb+X45YtHXqc2iXpsoJ84KHWHLbi07F43t5gJAM9al4p+QwzCMgjp847dkDoBFYMkT17HfVYi2O7gnf+/ibqQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755535962; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RaZ61BdX4xFg8kvTPwXNCloQmCraD3QMXDwjjRuBcCQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sdztdY7Z/CQPStriYIICj4AMSUGFv6+bpBBNKhfXy2gEmUij08TUHpqM8xyGCD33rz2jit+ps5drSDTkC5FyHmk4xpqgmBe6vlFYoWd9Sw06sBRzKrVn0bwlCWeyMJVOAMmIdd8+WXnTiiDSbo9RhCxTSeBmy3k3kmkSU8Q07T4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=a4ClcLts; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="a4ClcLts" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net C9FBB40AE3 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1755535960; bh=jJoGfkPGzsovkqrZFk1ijrUb5+RpNsRfmQGTU3tcLYM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=a4ClcLtseQNfJ2HsK4yIgpDDIPypDBvyfHk33o4L47ucdFlgqbh2V3fPTEPxeGI5C GGne/mxIGdbeN14dc56VyXkEcUvEEchNZIl5+EFZKJguHI/MOElHpV1WRzjD7h5ljU mo0zFXMH4VX5wBQEBLpmmrdjSw0kW/g0AOVMC61anZno3VfqRBxlSaTCwGEWW/mtw3 l/eVMfpV+/Z+HgktROcgSl3ehRD+2rGsMVKJ3Mmo5LOmifdc0Nn4jTdR1teTw2KXQV RZyvnLsxgHiBW0orEIr/9PGu4laR2NLPjyuR+761HNTR7jSXQNbp+PEYX5p87rj+BI Q6vTnD9as6UcQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9FBB40AE3; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:52:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: NIKIL PAUL , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] docs: rcu: Replace multiple dead OLS links in RTFP.txt In-Reply-To: References: <20250812163233.7330-2-snikilpaul@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 10:52:38 -0600 Message-ID: <877bz08td5.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain [CCs restored] NIKIL PAUL writes: > A smal follow-up, Do i need to do any more changes on this before getting accepted? > It has two more changes which weren't in the previous version. So I only received 2/2, so I lack some context here. It seems you only reposted this one patch out of the series? When you make changes, you need to post the whole series so that maintainers know what is going on. Thanks, jon