mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Gratian Crisan <gratian@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] clocksource: Detect a watchdog overflow
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:14:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877fg9n8d4.fsf@ni.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLUnV4rmhcwxyEddEpha2v5=Z+g6L8_zGme2LPMxeE02Ng@mail.gmail.com>


John Stultz writes:

> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> wrote:
>> The clocksource watchdog can falsely trigger and disable the main
>> clocksource when the watchdog wraps around.
>>
>> The reason is that an interrupt storm and/or high priority (FIFO/RR) tasks
>> can preempt the timer softirq long enough for the watchdog to wrap around
>> if it has a limited number of bits available by comparison to the main
>> clocksource. One observed example is on a Intel Baytrail platform where TSC
>> is the main clocksource, HPET is disabled due to a hardware bug and acpi_pm
>> gets selected as the watchdog clocksource.
>>
>> Calculate the maximum number of nanoseconds the watchdog clocksource can
>> represent without overflow and do not disqualify the main clocksource if
>> the delta since the last time we have checked exceeds the measurement
>> capabilities of the watchdog clocksource.
>
> Sorry for not getting back to you sooner on this. You managed to send
> these both out while I was at a conference and on vacation, and so
> they were deep in the mail backlog. :)

No worries, I'm actually "on the road" this week too (ELC). I appreciate
the reply.

> So I'm sympathetic to this issue, because I remember seeing similar
> problems w/ runaway SCHED_FIFO tasks w/ PREEMPT_RT.

Yeah, a runaway rt thread can easily do it. That's just bad design. In
our case it was a bit more subtle bc. it was a combination of high
priority interrupts and rt threads that would occasionally stack up to
delay the timer softirq long enough to cause the watchdog wrap.

> However, its really difficult to create a solution without opening new
> cases where bad clocksources will be mis-identified as good (which
> your solution seems to suffer as well, measuring the time past with a
> known bad clocksource can easily result in large deltas, which will be
> ignored if the watchdog has a short interval).

Fair point. Ultimately you have to trust one of the clocksources. I
guess I was naive in thinking that the main clocksource can't drift more
than what the watchdog clocksource can measure within the
WATCHDOG_INTERVAL. I'm glad I don't have to deal with hardware that
lobotomized.

Would a simple solution that exposes the config option for the
clocksource wathchdog[1] (and defaults it to on) be an acceptable
alternative? It will work for us because we test the stability of the
main clocksource - part of the hardware bring-up.

> A previous effort on this was made here, and there's a resulting
> thread that didn't come to resolution:
>     https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/17/542

Sorry I've missed it.

> Way back I had tried to come up with an approach where if the time
> delta was large, it was divided by the watchdog interval, and then we
> just compared the remainder with the current watchdog delta to see if
> they matched (closely enough). Unfortunately this didn't work out for
> me then, but perhaps it deserves a second try?

I've entertained that idea too but I think I was trying to optimize
things too early and do everything with the mult/shift math. That first
attempt failed but I do need to try harder because it would be a better
general solution.

> thanks
> -john

Thanks,
-Gratian

[1]

>From e942ddaba439cd6711e9eed44ceae34167b864f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:20:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] time: Make the clocksource watchdog user configurable

The clocksource watchdog is used to detect instabilities in the current
clocksource. This is a beneficial feature on new/unknown hardware however
it can create problems by falsely triggering when the watchdog wraps. The
reason is that an interrupt storm and/or high priority (FIFO/RR) tasks can
preempt the timer softirq long enough for the watchdog to wrap if it has a
limited number of bits available by comparison with the main clocksource.

One observed example is on a Intel Baytrail platform where TSC is the main
clocksource, HPET is disabled due to a hardware bug and acpi_pm gets
selected as the watchdog clocksource.

Provide the option to disable the clocksource watchdog for hardware where
the clocksource stability has been validated.

Signed-off-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig    |  2 +-
 kernel/time/Kconfig | 12 +++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 2dc18605..6da5d9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ config X86
 	select CLKEVT_I8253
 	select CLKSRC_I8253			if X86_32
 	select CLOCKSOURCE_VALIDATE_LAST_CYCLE
-	select CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG
+	select HAVE_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG
 	select CLONE_BACKWARDS			if X86_32
 	select COMPAT_OLD_SIGACTION		if IA32_EMULATION
 	select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
index 4008d9f..6707f1d 100644
--- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 # Options selectable by arch Kconfig
 
 # Watchdog function for clocksources to detect instabilities
-config CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG
+config HAVE_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG
 	bool
 
 # Architecture has extra clocksource data
@@ -193,5 +193,15 @@ config HIGH_RES_TIMERS
 	  hardware is not capable then this option only increases
 	  the size of the kernel image.
 
+config CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG
+	bool "Clocksource watchdog"
+	depends on HAVE_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG
+	default y
+	help
+	  This option enables the watchdog function for clocksources. It is
+	  used to detect instabilities in the currently selected clocksource.
+
+	  Say Y if you are unsure.
+
 endmenu
 endif
-- 
1.9.1

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-07  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-15 18:50 Gratian Crisan
2016-04-06 22:21 ` John Stultz
2016-04-07  8:14   ` Gratian Crisan [this message]
2016-04-07 16:31     ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877fg9n8d4.fsf@ni.com \
    --to=gratian.crisan@ni.com \
    --cc=gratian@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome