From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add __GFP_ZERO to alloc_cpumask_var_node() if ptr is zero
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 07:00:24 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877fku553z.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151204073437.GA24827@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> writes:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:05:12 +1030
>> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> > This is clever, but I would advise against such subtle code. We will never be
>> > able to remove this code once it is in.
>> >
>> > Would suggest making the non-CPUMASK_OFFSTACK stubs write garbage into the
>> > cpumasks instead, iff !(flags & __GFP_ZERO).
>>
>> I actually thought of the same thing, but thought it was a bit harsh. If others
>> think that's a better solution, then I'll submit a patch to do that.
>
> That just makes things more fragile - 'garbage' will spread the breakage, and if
> the breakage is subtle, it will spread subtle breakage.
>
> So why not use a kzmalloc_node() [equivalent] call instead of kmalloc_node(), to
> make sure it's all zeroed instead of uninitialized?
OTOH, why not make *every* kmalloc a kzmalloc?
The issue here is not that the issue is subtle (not using a zeroing
allocator is a pretty clear bug), it's that it's papered over by the
normal config.
If we had a config option already to garbage-fill allocations, it'd be a
simple solution.
I don't think there are great answers here. But adding more subtle
zeroing semantics feels wrong, even if it will mostly Just Work.
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-06 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-03 22:24 Steven Rostedt
2015-12-04 1:35 ` Rusty Russell
2015-12-04 2:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-04 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-04 20:30 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2015-12-06 17:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-07 1:56 ` Rusty Russell
2015-12-07 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877fku553z.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome