From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755387AbbIXN0f (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:26:35 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:55880 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753867AbbIXN0e (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:26:34 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,581,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="812043692" From: Jani Nikula To: "davej\@codemonkey.org.uk" , "Lankhorst\, Maarten" Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "torvalds\@linux-foundation.org" , "intel-gfx\@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Roper\, Matthew D" , "Vetter\, Daniel" , "dri-devel\@lists.freedesktop.org" , "jbarnes\@virtuousgeek.org" , "airlied\@linux.ie" , "Miramontes Caton\, Jairo Daniel" Subject: Re: [regression] [git pull] drm for 4.3 In-Reply-To: <20150924035108.GA19724@codemonkey.org.uk> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20150907184559.GA18393@codemonkey.org.uk> <20150921184849.GA25222@codemonkey.org.uk> <56016D01.5010708@virtuousgeek.org> <20150922151355.GX3383@phenom.ffwll.local> <20150922161558.GB24128@intel.com> <20150923014909.GA18010@codemonkey.org.uk> <1443006475.22058.1.camel@intel.com> <20150924035108.GA19724@codemonkey.org.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+57~gff3a03d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:26:28 +0300 Message-ID: <877fng54or.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, "davej@codemonkey.org.uk" wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +0000, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]: > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > > > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of > > > > > > their recent patches. > > > > > > > > Sounds like this showed up before my recent work, but I think I might > > > > have seen similar problems while working on atomic watermarks; the > > > > issues I was seeing were because the initial hardware readout could > > > > leave primary->visible set to true even when the CRTC was off. My > > > > series (which is still under development) contains this patch to fix > > > > that: > > > > > > > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/59564/ > > > > > > > > Does applying that help with the problems reported here? > > > > > > No difference at all for me. > > Looks like a (reopened) dup of 91952? > > > > Can you apply "[PATCH] drm/i915: Add primary plane to mask if it's > > visible", and get me the results? > > This doesn't apply on top of Linus' current tree. > If you let me know what it's dependant on, I'll do a build with > those patches tomorrow. It's now part of the drm-intel-fixes pull request [1], maybe it's easiest to pull that in? Just four commits on top of v4.3-rc2. Alternatively pick it up from our repo [2]. Thanks, Jani. [1] http://mid.gmane.org/87si646uyf.fsf@intel.com [2] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-fixes&id=721a09f7393de6c28a07516dccd654c6e995944a > > Dave > -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center