From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] sched: maintain the load contribution of blocked entities
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:27:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877guqykji.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120628022414.30496.4580.stgit@kitami.mtv.corp.google.com> (Paul Turner's message of "Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:24:14 -0700")
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:24:14 -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> We are currently maintaining:
> runnable_load(cfs_rq) = \Sum task_load(t)
>
> For all running children t of cfs_rq. While this can be naturally updated for
> tasks in a runnable state (as they are scheduled); this does not account for
> the load contributed by blocked task entities.
>
> This can be solved by introducing a separate accounting for blocked load:
> blocked_load(cfs_rq) = \Sum runnable(b) * weight(b)
>
> Obviously we do not want to iterate over all blocked entities to account for
> their decay, we instead observe that:
> runnable_load(t) = \Sum p_i*y^i
>
> and that to account for an additional idle period we only need to compute:
> y*runnable_load(t).
>
> This means that we can compute all blocked entities at once by evaluating:
> blocked_load(cfs_rq)` = y * blocked_load(cfs_rq)
>
> Finally we maintain a decay counter so that when a sleeping entity re-awakens
> we can determine how much of its load should be removed from the blocked sum.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 1
> kernel/sched/core.c | 3 +
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 3 +
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 +-
> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 0c54ce0..842c4df 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1139,6 +1139,7 @@ struct load_weight {
> struct sched_avg {
> u32 runnable_avg_sum, runnable_avg_period;
> u64 last_runnable_update;
> + s64 decay_count;
> unsigned long load_avg_contrib;
> };
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9bb7d28..aeb8e56 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1713,6 +1713,9 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
> p->se.vruntime = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->se.group_node);
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> + p->se.avg.decay_count = 0;
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
> memset(&p->se.statistics, 0, sizeof(p->se.statistics));
> #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index aeb74e3..2aa60cf 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct task_group
> P(se->avg.runnable_avg_sum);
> P(se->avg.runnable_avg_period);
> P(se->avg.load_avg_contrib);
> + P(se->avg.decay_count);
> #endif
> #undef PN
> #undef P
> @@ -230,6 +231,8 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> atomic_read(&cfs_rq->tg->load_weight));
> SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %lld\n", "runnable_load_avg",
> cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg);
> + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %lld\n", "blocked_load_avg",
> + cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg);
> #endif
>
> print_cfs_group_stats(m, cpu, cfs_rq->tg);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 8229766..6200d20 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1085,6 +1085,20 @@ static __always_inline int __update_entity_runnable_avg(u64 now,
> return decayed;
> }
>
> +/* Synchronize an entity's decay with its parentin cfs_rq.*/
parenting
> +static inline void __synchronize_entity_decay(struct sched_entity *se)
> +{
> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> + u64 decays = atomic64_read(&cfs_rq->decay_counter);
> +
> + decays -= se->avg.decay_count;
> + if (!decays)
> + return;
> +
> + se->avg.load_avg_contrib = decay_load(se->avg.load_avg_contrib, decays);
> + se->avg.decay_count += decays;
> +}
> +
> /* Compute the current contribution to load_avg by se, return any delta */
> static long __update_entity_load_avg_contrib(struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> @@ -1100,8 +1114,18 @@ static long __update_entity_load_avg_contrib(struct sched_entity *se)
> return se->avg.load_avg_contrib - old_contrib;
> }
>
> +static inline void subtract_blocked_load_contrib(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> + long load_contrib)
> +{
> + if (likely(load_contrib < cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg))
> + cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg -= load_contrib;
> + else
> + cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg = 0;
> +}
> +
> /* Update a sched_entity's runnable average */
> -static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
> +static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se,
> + int update_cfs_rq)
> {
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> long contrib_delta;
> @@ -1111,8 +1135,34 @@ static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
> return;
>
> contrib_delta = __update_entity_load_avg_contrib(se);
> +
> + if (!update_cfs_rq)
> + return;
> +
> if (se->on_rq)
> cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg += contrib_delta;
> + else
> + subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq, -contrib_delta);
Subtracting negative delta means an addition, right?
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Decay the load contributed by all blocked children and account this so that
> + * they their contribution may appropriately discounted when they wake up.
s/they their/their/ ?
> + */
> +static void update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
I guess update_cfs_blocked_load is a bit more consistent name with
update_cfs_{load,shares}.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> +{
> + u64 now = rq_of(cfs_rq)->clock_task >> 20;
> + u64 decays;
> +
> + decays = now - cfs_rq->last_decay;
> + if (!decays)
> + return;
> +
> + cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg = decay_load(cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg,
> + decays);
> + atomic64_add(decays, &cfs_rq->decay_counter);
> +
> + cfs_rq->last_decay = now;
> }
>
> static inline void update_rq_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq, int runnable)
> @@ -1122,26 +1172,56 @@ static inline void update_rq_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq, int runnable)
>
> /* Add the load generated by se into cfs_rq's child load-average */
> static inline void enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> - struct sched_entity *se)
> -{
> - update_entity_load_avg(se);
> + struct sched_entity *se,
> + int wakeup)
> +{
> + /* we track migrations using entity decay_count == 0 */
> + if (unlikely(!se->avg.decay_count)) {
> + se->avg.last_runnable_update = rq_of(cfs_rq)->clock_task;
> + se->avg.decay_count = atomic64_read(&cfs_rq->decay_counter);
> + wakeup = 0;
> + } else {
> + __synchronize_entity_decay(se);
> + }
> +
> + if (wakeup)
> + subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq, se->avg.load_avg_contrib);
> +
> + update_entity_load_avg(se, 0);
> cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg += se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> + update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq);
> }
>
> -/* Remove se's load from this cfs_rq child load-average */
> +/*
> + * Remove se's load from this cfs_rq child load-average, if the entity is
> + * transitioning to a blocked state we track its projected decay using
> + * blocked_load_avg.
> + */
> static inline void dequeue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> - struct sched_entity *se)
> + struct sched_entity *se,
> + int sleep)
> {
> - update_entity_load_avg(se);
> + update_entity_load_avg(se, 1);
> +
> cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg -= se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> + if (sleep) {
> + cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg += se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> + se->avg.decay_count = atomic64_read(&cfs_rq->decay_counter);
> + } else {
> + se->avg.decay_count = 0;
> + }
> }
> #else
> -static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se) {}
> +static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se,
> + int update_cfs_rq) {}
> static inline void update_rq_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq, int runnable) {}
> static inline void enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> - struct sched_entity *se) {}
> + struct sched_entity *se,
> + int wakeup) {}
> static inline void dequeue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> - struct sched_entity *se) {}
> + struct sched_entity *se,
> + int sleep) {}
> +static inline void update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) {}
> #endif
>
> static void enqueue_sleeper(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> @@ -1270,7 +1350,7 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> */
> update_curr(cfs_rq);
> update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
> - enqueue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
> + enqueue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
> account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
> update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
>
> @@ -1345,7 +1425,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> * Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
> */
> update_curr(cfs_rq);
> - dequeue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
> + dequeue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
>
> update_stats_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
> if (flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP) {
> @@ -1516,7 +1596,7 @@ static void put_prev_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *prev)
> /* Put 'current' back into the tree. */
> __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, prev);
> /* in !on_rq case, update occurred at dequeue */
> - update_entity_load_avg(prev);
> + update_entity_load_avg(prev, 1);
> }
> cfs_rq->curr = NULL;
> }
> @@ -1532,7 +1612,8 @@ entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr, int queued)
> /*
> * Ensure that runnable average is periodically updated.
> */
> - update_entity_load_avg(curr);
> + update_entity_load_avg(curr, 1);
> + update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq);
>
> /*
> * Update share accounting for long-running entities.
> @@ -2391,6 +2472,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>
> update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
> update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
> + update_entity_load_avg(se, 1);
> }
>
> if (!se) {
> @@ -2452,6 +2534,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>
> update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
> update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
> + update_entity_load_avg(se, 1);
> }
>
> if (!se) {
> @@ -3557,6 +3640,7 @@ static int update_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
>
> update_rq_clock(rq);
> update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 1);
> + update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq);
>
> /*
> * We need to update shares after updating tg->load_weight in
> @@ -5379,6 +5463,21 @@ static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0);
> se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> }
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> + /*
> + * Remove our load from contribution when we leave sched_fair
> + * and ensure we don't carry in an old decay_count if we
> + * switch back.
> + */
> + if (p->se.avg.decay_count) {
> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(&p->se);
> + __synchronize_entity_decay(&p->se);
> + subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq,
> + p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib);
> + p->se.avg.decay_count = 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -5425,6 +5524,9 @@ void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> #endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> + atomic64_set(&cfs_rq->decay_counter, 1);
> +#endif
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 26cc36f..a96adf1 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -229,7 +229,9 @@ struct cfs_rq {
> * This allows for the description of both thread and group usage (in
> * the FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case).
> */
> - u64 runnable_load_avg;
> + u64 runnable_load_avg, blocked_load_avg;
> + atomic64_t decay_counter;
> + u64 last_decay;
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> struct rq *rq; /* cpu runqueue to which this cfs_rq is attached */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-29 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-28 2:24 [PATCH 00/16] Series short description Paul Turner
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 06/16] sched: account for blocked load waking back up Paul Turner
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 08/16] sched: compute load contribution by a group entity Paul Turner
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 03/16] sched: aggregate load contributed by task entities on parenting cfs_rq Paul Turner
2012-06-28 6:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-07-04 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-06 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-09 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 04/16] sched: maintain the load contribution of blocked entities Paul Turner
2012-06-29 1:27 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 02/16] sched: maintain per-rq runnable averages Paul Turner
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 09/16] sched: normalize tg load contributions against runnable time Paul Turner
2012-06-29 7:26 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-07-04 19:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-06 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-12 1:08 ` Andre Noll
2012-07-12 0:02 ` Paul Turner
2012-07-06 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 01/16] sched: track the runnable average on a per-task entitiy basis Paul Turner
2012-06-28 6:06 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-07-12 0:14 ` Paul Turner
2012-07-04 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-12 0:12 ` Paul Turner
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 07/16] sched: aggregate total task_group load Paul Turner
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 05/16] sched: add an rq migration call-back to sched_class Paul Turner
2012-06-29 1:32 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 14/16] sched: make __update_entity_runnable_avg() fast Paul Turner
2012-07-04 15:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-04 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-09 20:18 ` Benjamin Segall
2012-07-10 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-12 0:15 ` Paul Turner
2012-07-12 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-04 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 15/16] sched: implement usage tracking Paul Turner
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 13/16] sched: update_cfs_shares at period edge Paul Turner
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 11/16] sched: replace update_shares weight distribution with per-entity computation Paul Turner
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 16/16] sched: introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking Paul Turner
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 12/16] sched: refactor update_shares_cpu() -> update_blocked_avgs() Paul Turner
2012-06-29 7:28 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-07-12 0:03 ` Paul Turner
2012-07-05 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-12 0:11 ` Paul Turner
2012-07-12 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-28 2:24 ` [PATCH 10/16] sched: maintain runnable averages across throttled periods Paul Turner
2012-08-23 14:14 [patch 00/16] sched: per-entity load-tracking pjt
2012-08-23 14:14 ` [patch 04/16] sched: maintain the load contribution of blocked entities pjt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877guqykji.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome