From: Reinhard Tartler <Reinhard.Tartler@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Jean Sacren <sakiwit@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vamos-dev@lists.informatik.uni-erlangen.de, amwang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: Fix checking return value of 'fwrite'
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:30:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877h2r1hb3.fsf@faui43f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111123055351.GB14454@mail.gmail.com> (Jean Sacren's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:53:51 -0700")
On Mi, Nov 23, 2011 at 06:53:51 (CET), Jean Sacren wrote:
> From: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:24:35 +0100
>>
>> On 7.10.2011 05:29, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > 2011/10/6 Reinhard Tartler <Reinhard.Tartler@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>:
>> >> fwrite indicates '1' written member if a zero-length string is written.
>> > you forgot the "Signed-off-by: " part :)
>>
>> Reinhard, can I assume
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Reinhard Tartler
>> <Reinhard.Tartler@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
>>
>> ? The patch is otherwise correct.
>
> I have two reasons to oppose this patch.
>
> 1. If 'len' value is zero, there is an issue already and it should be
> taken care of _before_ calling fwrite().
So you're saying the function assumes a non-empty string? Why? It is a
simple "writing-helper" and this seems a perfectly valid corner case to
me. Can you perhaps elaborate why you consider this corner case invalid
and require (possibly out-of-tree) callers to check this for themselves?
> 2. xfwrite() doesn't fix anything except for the compiler warning. It
> assumes this world is perfect and it's definitely not a place to take
> care of the zero-length string.
It seems to me that you rather oppose to the introduction of xfwrite()
than to the patch here at hand. Is that correct?
Cheers,
Reinhard
--
Reinhard Tartler Department of Computer Science IV
Martensstr 1, 91058 Erlangen Germany, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
http://www4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~tartler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-23 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-06 11:14 Reinhard Tartler
2011-10-07 2:34 ` Cong Wang
2011-10-07 3:29 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-11-20 13:24 ` Michal Marek
2011-11-20 15:53 ` Reinhard Tartler
2011-11-23 5:53 ` Jean Sacren
2011-11-23 6:30 ` Reinhard Tartler [this message]
2011-11-23 18:05 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-11-25 23:42 ` [PATCH] kbuild: Fix compiler warning with assertion when calling 'fwrite' Jean Sacren
2012-01-14 23:19 ` Michal Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877h2r1hb3.fsf@faui43f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--to=reinhard.tartler@informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=lacombar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sakiwit@gmail.com \
--cc=vamos-dev@lists.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®