Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 04/09/2025 09:51, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM
>> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
>> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
>> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
>> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
>> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
>> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
>> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
>> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
>> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
>> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
>> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
>>> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
>>> The
>>> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so
>>> no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a
>>> dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
>>
>> You just dropped all tags without explaining why.
> 
> Regretted inconvenience. 
> 
> There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and schemas 
> (patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5.  And review for 
> these changes is needed.  Hence, removed RB tag in this patch-set. 
> 
> There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/000401dc18cd$ec02a1b0$c407e510$@samsung.com/#:~:text=Let%20me%20know%2C%20because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20removing%20your%20%0A%27reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch%201%20and%203.
> 


Where in the changelog you explained why you dropped the tags?

Best regards,
Krzysztof