From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
emamd001@umn.edu, kjlu@umn.edu, smccaman@umn.edu,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: prevent memory leak
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:06:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87868186-c4a9-88fb-bcd3-c5f226c50e59@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190923223437.11086-1-navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
On 24.09.19 г. 1:34 ч., Navid Emamdoost wrote:
> In btrfsic_mount if btrfsic_dev_state_alloc fails the allocated state
> will be leaked. It needs to be released on error handling path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
NAK.
The allocated state could have been added to a btrfsic_dev_state which
in turn is linked by btrfsic_dev_state_hashtable_add. So when later
ds->state is dereferenced it will case a UAF and likely result in crash.
Looking at the integrity code I also don't like how it's structured e.g.
if a memory error occurs then only some devices will be added to the
btrfsic_dev_State_hashtable and the super block is not going to be
validated at all.
> ---
> fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
> index 0b52ab4cb964..8a77b0cb2db3 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
> @@ -2941,6 +2941,7 @@ int btrfsic_mount(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> if (NULL == ds) {
> pr_info("btrfs check-integrity: kmalloc() failed!\n");
> mutex_unlock(&btrfsic_mutex);
> + kvfree(state);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> ds->bdev = device->bdev;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-24 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-23 22:34 Navid Emamdoost
2019-09-24 7:06 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87868186-c4a9-88fb-bcd3-c5f226c50e59@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=emamd001@umn.edu \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=navid.emamdoost@gmail.com \
--cc=smccaman@umn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®