From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
To: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Excessive delays from GHES polling on dual-socket AMD EPYC
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:40:48 +0300 (MSK) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878e4019-3a88-798e-4427-7efb5289a4e1@ispras.ru> (raw)
Hello world,
when lightly testing a dual-socket server with 64-core AMD processors I
noticed that workloads running on cpu #0 can exhibit significantly worse
latencies compared to cpu #1 ... cpu #255. Checking SSD response time,
on cpu #0 I got:
taskset -c 0 ioping -R /dev/sdf
--- /dev/sdf (block device 1.75 TiB) ioping statistics ---
70.7 k requests completed in 2.97 s, 276.3 MiB read, 23.8 k iops, 93.1 MiB/s
generated 70.7 k requests in 3.00 s, 276.4 MiB, 23.6 k iops, 92.1 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 33.1 us / 41.9 us / 87.9 ms / 452.6 us
Notice 87.9 millisecond maximum response time, and compare with its
hyperthread sibing:
taskset -c 128 ioping -R /dev/sdf
--- /dev/sdf (block device 1.75 TiB) ioping statistics ---
80.5 k requests completed in 2.96 s, 314.5 MiB read, 27.2 k iops, 106.2 MiB/s
generated 80.5 k requests in 3.00 s, 314.5 MiB, 26.8 k iops, 104.8 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 33.2 us / 36.8 us / 89.2 us / 2.00 us
Of course maximum times themselves vary from run to run, but the general
picture stays: on cpu #0 I get about three orders of magnitude
longer latencies. I think this is outside of "latency-sensitive
workloads might care" territory and closer to "hurts everyone" kind of
issue, hence I'm reporting it.
On this machine there's AMD HEST ACPI table that registers 14342 polled
"generic hardware error sources" (GHES) with poll interval 5 seconds.
(this seems misdesigned: it will cause cross-socket polling unless the
OS takes special care to divine which GHES to poll from where)
Linux setups a timer for each of those individually, so when the machine
is idle there's approximately 2800 timers per second invoked on cpu #0.
Plus, there's a secondary issue with timer migration:
get_nohz_timer_target will attempt to select a non-idle CPU out of 256
(visiting some CPUs repeatedly if they appear in nested domains), and
fail. If I help it along by running 'taskset -c 1 yes > /dev/null' or
disable kernel.timer_migration entirely, it drops maximum latency in the
above ioping test to 1..10ms range (down to two orders of magnitude from
three).
I guess the short answer is that if I don't like it I can boot that
server with 'ghes_disable=1', but is a proper solution possible? Like
requiring explicit opt-in to honor polled GHES entries?
Thank you.
Alexander
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-27 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-27 21:40 Alexander Monakov [this message]
2021-12-02 16:01 ` Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-02 18:46 ` Alexander Monakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878e4019-3a88-798e-4427-7efb5289a4e1@ispras.ru \
--to=amonakov@ispras.ru \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®