From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be>
To: Mohammed EL Kadiri <med08elkadiri@gmail.com>,
hughd@google.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, andrealmeid@igalia.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shmem: fix unicode_map leak with repeated casefold= option
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:32:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878q4jyf1z.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a57ec70731165b4b1244fa89bba95c82a666df8.1790712330.git.med08elkadiri@gmail.com>
Mohammed EL Kadiri <med08elkadiri@gmail.com> writes:
> Each casefold= option makes shmem_parse_opt_casefold() allocate a
> unicode_map with utf8_load() and store it in ctx->encoding. When the
> option is given more than once in the same mount, the later call
> overwrites ctx->encoding and the earlier map is never freed.
>
> Reproducer:
>
> mount -t tmpfs -o casefold,casefold tmpfs /t; umount /t
>
> Repeating this 50000 times grows kmalloc-32 by about 50000 objects,
> and kmemleak reports them as allocated from:
>
> utf8_load+0x21/0x110
> shmem_parse_opt_casefold.isra.0+0x65/0x100
> shmem_parse_one+0x368/0x510
>
> Free the old map before storing the new one, so only the last
> casefold= is kept. On a normal mount with a single casefold=,
> ctx->encoding is still NULL at that point and utf8_unload(NULL)
> does nothing, so nothing changes there.
>
> With this patch the same loop leaves kmalloc-32 flat and kmemleak
> reports nothing.
>
> Fixes: 58e55efd6c72 ("tmpfs: Add casefold lookup support")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed EL Kadiri <med08elkadiri@gmail.com>
> ---
> This is a separate leak from the remount one fixed in
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ba38f80f629fd093c77f3a49fdab7b71ee7bbc5f.1790687276.git.med08elkadiri@gmail.com/
> which Gabriel has reviewed; I found it while testing that patch.
> The two apply in either order. Tested on mm-unstable, alone and
> together: kmalloc-32 stays flat for duplicate casefold=, single
> casefold= and remount, and kmemleak is clean.
>
> mm/shmem.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 07b2855dfb7b..262f1bcb6144 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -4731,6 +4731,7 @@ static int shmem_parse_opt_casefold(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *
> pr_info("tmpfs: Using encoding : utf8-%u.%u.%u\n",
> unicode_major(version), unicode_minor(version), unicode_rev(version));
>
> + utf8_unload(ctx->encoding);
> ctx->encoding = encoding;
IMO, nack, this is not the right fix. There is no point in accepting
multiple casefold parameters and we shouldn't allow it. If
ctx->encoding is already set, we should -EINVAL and fail the mount.
>
> return 0;
>
> base-commit: 90ddfbd1963659ca4a5d3d7f20717a4222682a8e
> --
> 2.53.0
>
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 20:20 Mohammed EL Kadiri
2026-09-29 20:32 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2026-09-29 20:59 ` Mohammed EL Kadiri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878q4jyf1z.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be \
--to=gabriel@krisman.be \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=med08elkadiri@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®