From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E2B3C871F; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773328384; cv=none; b=TXpw0xp8X6um/N4lA3JcQu3XtuS+TiDOzlisCcPAugs7FZV0Se6FIxq9Lnn2yMHO8ofizoQJCShkwhENR6m1dXZ7AScZ6ByvEf64DqjuINZ5I4XV2XDOFrldLhO8oIUqaQDkRulF+HdfOJ4qOSR0BLTqYdKpCf+7UCABn5EDkq0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773328384; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+uVZHmCvH6N0NYZ3ZR2SnLFWhOYTyhiJqlrvhDQmJtY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TBc8C/OWOR5mxw1YDr0JafAbo8aKqxPD3BIWbhbz1agsEfCe03Zro0vku0p8j4SLFIf+QY5+cZPqLLSsOiZh77JKXEJs83iegKPrkLiL9iX58RyK7Xev8pY8XSMfyY2wkQDxH8YyRydLjxz2QM9X381QfOFVmOvZ0T6LwqBknp8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=hFPoZ5kR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="hFPoZ5kR" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 7B60F411D3 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1773328376; bh=uFSHnJsT5rufL0kLtu7rBgsALDTtyJby5Y76awly3qQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hFPoZ5kRo5C4yHQuPo7UUPR1VPrxdiekHUwpTyLfTfH5lJJDBMmlOivYZwz2OvQYN HKGdgJkS9qC7Q1XTa27cUI41DOhC51vmZR5JBomA48ZT9x0xhwzxqwgYafi2hBCHK+ vXm3rAmc0cJwtnkQ0jeJMrSu0pGAZRTzmNFB3xSGTj3lvAt/lJi3Oe/QMFk8VXdo/m g508VZLk0pQvpxFF97m81RD0oL9RlHVqWw1iY1/8FpBBk3PmLrKYxkSg6PvUG3meCO yziGRVrXI2BvpJ5xD9wxNfAJztek0BQAlSBcIT3tFGbctv+CcHPOLdQIsT5odIVoUF MCm/TB4XNvA6A== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B60F411D3; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:12:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Werner Sembach , Randy Dunlap , W_Armin@gmx.de, hansg@kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, Shuah Khan Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] Documentation: laptops: Update documentation for uniwill laptops In-Reply-To: <5bb7a2ae-9754-4375-a1f5-ef23916e26dc@tuxedocomputers.com> References: <20260310234022.2085232-1-wse@tuxedocomputers.com> <20260310234022.2085232-6-wse@tuxedocomputers.com> <363b80db-9bf3-44d5-a756-e64d29bd36ec@infradead.org> <5bb7a2ae-9754-4375-a1f5-ef23916e26dc@tuxedocomputers.com> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 09:12:55 -0600 Message-ID: <878qbxozd4.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Werner Sembach writes: > Hi Randy, > > Am 11.03.26 um 05:57 schrieb Randy Dunlap: >> Hi Werner, >> >> On 3/10/26 4:34 PM, Werner Sembach wrote: >>> Adds short description for two new sysfs entries, ctgp_offset and >>> usb_c_power_priority, to the documentation of uniwill laptops. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach >>> Reviewed-by: Armin Wolf >>> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap >>> --- >>> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uniwill-laptop | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> .../admin-guide/laptops/uniwill-laptop.rst | 12 +++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+) >>> >> >> Can you give me a lore.kernel.org URL or a message-ID in which >> I replied with a "Reviewed-by:" tag for this patch, please? >> I don't recall doing so, but I could have. > > Thought you did go through it because you gave the spelling corrections, > > Sorry I can ofc remove it again. As described in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst, a tag like Reviewed-by must be explicitly offered by the named person; you can't make them up yourself. That's something you need to be careful about. Thanks, jon