From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BD51328259; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768232617; cv=none; b=B/7o2EUXgB5VH/0jixIsYW/U/FR1rMucA9HJe+kMNSz4IfZMU75k/TPiRhoULIxliDMYW7katFt6ExOJX6/yYCU8+hG3jDCqWq8d1I/80GYYAzDlGOj7h8s36MMzaJGjDCOsU8931qiPjUMosRkDk0K9tTTPhqOJJcTbRW3vriA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768232617; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4rM73ldEgDqTXeCSOwDoPPvApc5KExqNZNPkAtoJwZw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VEFZ4NCw+RNZudoUBf/4m0NsLRRzv3+cR6aEwMuBnQrdsLYADcrlfrn4gtMqHYz6ThlQec4WH5CRXhaVtulQ0AYzZLeEoB6rHNu9LTzLiLfluwiqBwPMYObaWXoFbFN2o2CGIDZeFJvpewgpWywyQbRwz4EJAJhvVfjop0RnaYA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=WWFqswxH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="WWFqswxH" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 21ACF40C6D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1768232609; bh=vYpihDm+YgZ1i0sLBXFLKEDnED6PXnWlOn5RYbXX8iM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=WWFqswxHdGpdpJRJtFJMx5ZF+TtFRSFIRWHqWbaSLDC5FmIlXAu1lkHSjK8EMhJ/P GBO7H4bs6rfMt2+HSXdFOdqXNsEvjoeMNVwsE1/otfb0nKUJmj+Yvo4Q437MuaQNuo jCEKlQh4wTnK3A1NMBBbTDPUNzYWTgrqdNVqjWITE9DRLNG+snpZFEGBImcEGqkB5J KI2rHxxVFHPui9M/MbKeJnKdbXaqLMoIpswdU/0jvIoF8si2u9Dj/aYOTEMi8l772s CHAXdMQggK/PSXq0YMDjgwRiUBl7LyanFEChZZJxPEWDXFXhuPFF6xxM/YJ4t/7eAK AP1JZ1oc135hg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21ACF40C6D; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:43:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] scripts/kernel-doc: ensure that comments are using our coding style In-Reply-To: <7604a45e8ade06994afeb68616cf1838dd1101ec.1768229902.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> References: <7604a45e8ade06994afeb68616cf1838dd1101ec.1768229902.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:43:28 -0700 Message-ID: <878qe23kgv.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Along kernel-doc libs, we opted to have all comments starting/ending > with a blank comment line. Use the same style here. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > --- > scripts/kernel-doc.py | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc.py b/scripts/kernel-doc.py > index 5d2f29e90ebe..7ccee4626478 100755 > --- a/scripts/kernel-doc.py > +++ b/scripts/kernel-doc.py > @@ -197,7 +197,9 @@ def main(): > parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(formatter_class=argparse.RawTextHelpFormatter, > description=DESC) > > + # > # Normal arguments > + # > > parser.add_argument("-v", "-verbose", "--verbose", action="store_true", > help="Verbose output, more warnings and other information.") [nit] I approve of this kind of change, but I would get rid of the extra blank lines, just like we do with C code. (I wouldn't redo the series just for this). Thanks, jon