mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kunit: run test suites only after module initialization completes
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:15:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878r6icenj.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231128101627.65399-1-marpagan@redhat.com>

Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com> writes:

Hello Marco,

[...]

> @@ -737,12 +738,14 @@ static void kunit_module_exit(struct module *mod)
>  	};
>  	const char *action = kunit_action();
>  
> +	if (!suite_set.start || !virt_addr_valid(suite_set.start))
> +		return;
> +

I would add a comment here explaining why this condition is checked and
what it means. Maybe something like the following ?

+       /*
+        * Check if the kunit test suite start address is a virtual
+        * address or a direct mapping address. This is used as an
+        * indication of whether the kunit_filter_suites() was used
+        * to filter the kunit test suite or not.
+        *
+        * If is not a virtual address, then this means that the
+        * kunit_module_init() function was not called and the kunit
+        * suite was not filtered. Let's just bail out in that case.
+        */
+       if (!suite_set.start || !virt_addr_valid(suite_set.start))
+               return;

The patch makes sense to me though and agree that is a better approach.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-28 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-28 10:16 Marco Pagani
2023-11-28 11:15 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2023-11-28 18:40   ` Marco Pagani
2023-12-06 13:09 ` Richard Fitzgerald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878r6icenj.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marpagan@redhat.com \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®