Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] net: microchip: sparx5: add support for apptrust

[Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>]

<Daniel.Machon@microchip.com> writes:

>> >> > Make use of set/getapptrust() to implement per-selector trust and trust
>> >> > order.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_dcb.c    | 116 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >  .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h   |   3 +
>> >> >  .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.c   |   4 +-
>> >> >  .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.h   |   2 +
>> >> >  .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c    |   4 +
>> >> >  5 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_dcb.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_dcb.c
>> >> > index db17c124dac8..10aeb422b1ae 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_dcb.c
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_dcb.c
>> >> > @@ -8,6 +8,22 @@
>> >> >
>> >> >  #include "sparx5_port.h"
>> >> >
>> >> > +static const struct sparx5_dcb_apptrust {
>> >> > +     u8 selectors[256];
>> >> > +     int nselectors;
>> >> > +     char *names;
>> >>
>> >> I think this should be just "name".
>> >
>> > I dont think so. This is a str representation of all the selector values.
>> > "names" makes more sense to me.
>> 
>> But it just points to one name, doesn't it? The name of this apptrust
>> policy...
>
> It points to a str of space-separated selector names. I inteded it to
> be a str repr. of the selector values, and not a str identifier of the
> apptrust policy.

Ah, that's what you mean. Sure, NP :)