From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59637C47420 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F314F20791 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="aalLhxTT"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="+0cpSGl+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728679AbgI3SLq (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:11:46 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:58484 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725355AbgI3SLp (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:11:45 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1601489503; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eXtBXXhiMVMdTYSCyK9KnC71AtIKQfsWx/V0UzZjSqs=; b=aalLhxTTFAUQOEA4S+jPMN0XZ7VE8ERlzT82B+AOWxenX32nsqgLWa/bYiqvfiOxx0w1Dc sV9R+Hp52bFesJRNB+HmHnqCYvBJXznlZPPdx+d9EwYl8ewLltm1Hcym/Ph1xDZyzKjJhL ZVs5Cw93bo+IiNxdmuCp3JcjzVSx6XSx551yPOrwgtVK/KEsPd0HKXZqyH23xMbaok4fD5 my8dTS5Y90I/giCW/fia+Yn5S/NE4gRRwcr5l+mByPUetyDTSTO15kuyfJ0C1TdjqTXL+l vicJtFiTWlmeiyaxl2Tbjh5IEvtXABQE3fDj45VcPymN9gXwFrPKlNHV6tPRrA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1601489503; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eXtBXXhiMVMdTYSCyK9KnC71AtIKQfsWx/V0UzZjSqs=; b=+0cpSGl+ZP0wOxBV5o33UW0ETwb2OixJ9wUOzToxF/4Yxscw/i8EIRz4QPlc5qG84wdWZD QI0HtoTSaEP0J8Dg== To: "Dey\, Megha" , Jason Gunthorpe Cc: LKML , x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Haiyang Zhang , Jon Derrick , Lu Baolu , Wei Liu , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Stephen Hemminger , Steve Wahl , Dimitri Sivanich , Russ Anderson , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , Stefano Stabellini , Marc Zyngier , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dave Jiang , Alex Williamson , Jacob Pan , Baolu Lu , Kevin Tian , Dan Williams , ravi.v.shankar@intel.com Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/46] x86, PCI, XEN, genirq ...: Prepare for device MSI In-Reply-To: References: <20200826111628.794979401@linutronix.de> <10b5d933-f104-7699-341a-0afb16640d54@intel.com> <87v9fvix5f.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20200930114301.GD816047@nvidia.com> <87k0wbi94b.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:11:43 +0200 Message-ID: <878scri17k.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Megha, On Wed, Sep 30 2020 at 10:25, Megha Dey wrote: > On 9/30/2020 8:20 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>> Your IMS patches? Why do you need something special again? > > By IMS patches, I meant your IMS driver patch that was updated (as it > was untested, it had some compile errors and we removed the IMS_QUEUE > parts) : Ok. > The whole patchset can be found here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f4a085f1-f6de-2539-12fe-c7308d243a4a@intel.com/ > > It would be great if you could review the IMS patches :) It somehow slipped through the cracks. I'll have a look. > We were hoping to get IMS in the 5.10 merge window :) Hope dies last, right? >>> We might be able to put together a mockup just to prove it >> If that makes Megha's stuff going that would of course be appreciated, >> but we can defer the IMS_QUEUE part for later. It's orthogonal to the >> IMS_ARRAY stuff. > > In our patch series, we have removed the IMS_QUEUE stuff and retained > only the IMS_ARRAY parts > as that was sufficient for us. That works. We can add that back when Jason has his puzzle pieces sorted. Thanks, tglx