From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752404AbdDEETN (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 00:19:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:50842 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751040AbdDEETL (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 00:19:11 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org AEF4660F31 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: David Miller Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2017-04-03 References: <87a87xohpp.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <20170404.103144.1438343234401389523.davem@davemloft.net> <87r318jc7g.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <20170404.113714.433018169237722838.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:19:03 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170404.113714.433018169237722838.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:37:14 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <878tnfjxl4.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > From: Kalle Valo > Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 20:48:35 +0300 > >> David Miller writes: >> >>> From: Kalle Valo >>> Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 14:26:10 +0300 >>> >>>> here few really small fixes. I'm hoping this to be the last pull request >>>> for 4.11. >>>> >>>> Please let me if there are any problems. >>> >>> Pulled, thanks. >>> >>> But I will warn you, you say fixes, but your Subject line and >>> GIT tag says "-next" so I pulled it into net-next. >> >> Sorry, I used the wrong pull request template and that's why I had the >> wrong subject in this pull request. So actually this was supposed to be >> for net, not net-next. Any chance you could also pull this to net so >> that we can still get the fixes to 4.11? > > Sure, done. Great, thank you. And sorry for this, I need to be more careful when sending the pull requests. -- Kalle Valo