From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754160AbaE3Fr6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 01:47:58 -0400 Received: from LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.151]:51098 "EHLO lgemrelse7q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751082AbaE3Fr5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 01:47:57 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.220.181 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@gmail.com From: Namhyung Kim To: Jiri Olsa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Corey Ashford , David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] perf tools: Factor sort elide References: <1400858147-7155-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:47:54 +0900 In-Reply-To: <1400858147-7155-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> (Jiri Olsa's message of "Fri, 23 May 2014 17:15:45 +0200") Message-ID: <878upjg6lx.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 May 2014 17:15:45 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > hi, > factoring the elide code to make perf_hpp__should_skip > function cheap call/check again. Both look good to me! Acked-by: Namhyung Kim > > Also I was wondering.. do we want to get rid of sort_entry > structs in favor of perf_hpp__* stuff? Any plans? Probably.. but there's no plan for me currently. :) Thanks, Namhyung