From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Seth Forshee <sforshee@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the zonefs tree with the vfs-idmapping tree
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 08:30:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87958074-baa4-b6c9-da0c-d654e4009611@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230124102535.1e21a533@canb.auug.org.au>
On 1/24/23 08:25, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Damien,
>
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 07:31:18 +0900 Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for that. Do you want me to rebase my for-6.3/for-next branch on
>> these patches ? I need to retest everything anyway, so I might as well do
>> that.
>
> You can only rebase on top of the vfs-idmapping tree if you get a
> guarantee that it is immutable. In any case, it may be better to merge
> (an immutable subset) of the vfs-idmapping tree (and fix up the
> conflicts) rather than rebasing on top of it.
OK. I think I will merge the 3 patches that create the conflict and rebase
the patches. I need that for retesting at least. But given the size of the
conflict resolution, I may push that as an update to my for-6.3/for-next
branch. Let me see...
> Alternatively, just leave the fix up to Linus (but mention it to him
> when you send your pull requests).
Understood. Let me retest first :)
Thanks !
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-23 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 21:59 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-23 22:31 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-01-23 23:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-23 23:30 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2023-01-24 0:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-24 0:11 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-01-24 8:32 ` Christian Brauner
2023-01-24 8:41 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87958074-baa4-b6c9-da0c-d654e4009611@opensource.wdc.com \
--to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sforshee@kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®