From: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
To: aditya.chillara@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: john.ogness@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pmladek@suse.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] stop_machine: Defer legacy console flushes while a CPU runs a stopper callback
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:16:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87984398-AD80-4AC8-B5FD-21219BA85FD5@mainlining.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910-defer-legacy-console-write-on-multi_cpu_stop-v2-1-88324d2f4e7f@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 10 September 2026 04:53:55 BST, Aditya Chillara
<aditya.chillara@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>The cpu stopper thread runs above every other scheduling class, so while a
>stopper callback executes, nothing else on that CPU is scheduled. If such
>a
>callback emits a normal-priority printk(), the legacy console path can
>synchronously flush the pending console backlog. On systems with a slow
>UART and a large backlog, this holds the CPU long enough to starve RT
>kthreads such as the watchdog pet, and for multi_cpu_stop() prevents the
>CPU from advancing the state machine while the other CPUs wait.
Oh!
>The
>resulting delay can prevent watchdog servicing long enough to trigger a
>watchdog bark or bite.
>
>The same can happen from an interrupt taken during the callback:
>multi_cpu_stop() keeps interrupts enabled during MULTI_STOP_PREPARE, and a
>printk() may be emitted from a softirq run on irq exit.
>
>Run CPU stopper callbacks in printk-deferred context to prevent legacy
>console flushes while they execute.
>
Wow! Thanks
Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
>Signed-off-by: Aditya Chillara <aditya.chillara@oss.qualcomm.com>
>---
>A device using a legacy UART console (console=ttyMSM0,115200n8) hit a
>watchdog bark/bite about 40 seconds after boot.
>
Which SOC?
>stop_machine() (used here for kprobe text patching) stops every CPU by
>running multi_cpu_stop() on each of them, through the per-CPU
>"migration/%u" threads. These threads run at a higher priority than the
>msm_watchdog thread. At bite time, all eight CPUs were still spinning in
>multi_cpu_stop()'s MULTI_STOP_PREPARE state, where interrupts are left
>enabled.
>
>Heavy SELinux denial logging had built up a large backlog on the
>console. One CPU took an interrupt while spinning in MULTI_STOP_PREPARE.
>Handling it eventually led to a printk(), and because the console was a
>legacy console, that printk() synchronously drained the whole backlog
>over the slow UART. While the drain was still running, the watchdog bark
>interrupt hit the same CPU, found no recent pet, and escalated to a
>bite.
>
>The captured stack for that CPU, innermost frame first:
>
> qcom_soc_set_wdt_bite
> qcom_wdt_bark_handler
> __handle_irq_event_percpu
> handle_irq_event
> handle_fasteoi_irq
> generic_handle_domain_irq
> gic_handle_irq
> do_interrupt_handler
> el1_interrupt
> el1h_64_irq_handler
> el1h_64_irq
> console_flush_all
> console_unlock
> vprintk_emit
> dev_vprintk_emit
> dev_printk_emit
> __dev_printk
> _dev_err
> btspi_sleep_timeout_handler
> call_timer_fn
> __run_timer_base
> run_timer_softirq
> handle_softirqs
> __do_softirq
> ____do_softirq
> call_on_irq_stack
> do_softirq_own_stack
> __irq_exit_rcu
> irq_exit_rcu
> el1_interrupt
> el1h_64_irq_handler
> el1h_64_irq
> multi_cpu_stop
> cpu_stopper_thread
> smpboot_thread_fn
> kthread
> ret_from_fork
Same question as above, but a added "Is this a modern SOC?"
>
>Every other CPU stayed parked in the rendezvous the whole time, since
>their stopper threads outrank msm_watchdog. Nothing could pet the
>watchdog until the drain finished.
>
>This was observed through multi_cpu_stop(), but the hazard is not
>specific to it. Every cpu stopper callback runs in stop_sched_class,
>above msm_watchdog and every other thread on the CPU, so a slow flush
>from any of them (including single-CPU callbacks such as the migration
>and task-migration stoppers) can starve the watchdog just as well. The
>fix therefore covers all stopper callbacks, not only multi_cpu_stop().
>
>Fix this by running the CPU stopper callbacks in printk-deferred context.
>
>Reproduced and verified with an out-of-tree test module that triggers
>stop_machine() with a queued console backlog and a printk() inside the
>rendezvous, paired with a kprobe-based script that flags any console
>flush happening while a CPU is inside a stopper callback.
Hmm, interesting, could you provide what you did? (Not in the description,
but to me so I can have a look at it)
>---
>Changes in v2:
>- Use printk_deferred_enter/exit() to defer legacy console flushes instead
> of in_cpu_stop().
>- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260827-defer-legacy-console-write-on-multi_cpu_stop-v1-0-3b9f6bb4679f@oss.qualcomm.com
>---
> kernel/stop_machine.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
>index d085ba1f4b44..31f7af41249f 100644
>--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
>+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
>@@ -507,7 +507,9 @@ static void cpu_stopper_thread(unsigned int cpu)
> stopper->caller = work->caller;
> stopper->fn = fn;
> preempt_count_inc();
>+ printk_deferred_enter();
> ret = fn(arg);
>+ printk_deferred_exit();
Clean! :)
> if (done) {
> if (ret)
> done->ret = ret;
>
>---
>base-commit: 77ae27fd98f3b548797c9f22c10ab5cf1c4ada53
>change-id: 20260824-defer-legacy-console-write-on-multi_cpu_stop-d3ef6f6b150b
>
>Best regards,
>--
>Aditya Chillara <aditya.chillara@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
>
>
--- Thanks!
https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@grrlz.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 3:53 Aditya Chillara
2026-09-10 8:43 ` John Ogness
2026-09-10 16:16 ` Bradley Morgan [this message]
2026-09-11 11:02 ` Aditya Chillara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87984398-AD80-4AC8-B5FD-21219BA85FD5@mainlining.org \
--to=brads@mainlining.org \
--cc=aditya.chillara@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®