mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Will Newton" <will.newton@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Daniel Drake" <dsd@gentoo.org>,
	"Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] introduce ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Kconfig symbol
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:39:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5b0800803200739v6d222afck850f221eae1edd70@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1206023695.16475.137.camel@johannes.berg>

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:

>  +For some ethernet hardware that cannot DMA to unaligned addresses like
>  +4*n+2 or non-ethernet hardware, this can be a problem, and it is then
>  +required to copy the incoming frame into an aligned buffer. Because this is
>  +unnecessary on architectures that can do unaligned accesses, the code can be
>  +made depend on CONFIG_ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS like so:
>  +
>  +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
>  +       skb = copy skb
>  +#else
>  +       skb = original skb
>  +#endif

Is this logic reversed?

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-20 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-20 14:34 Johannes Berg
2008-03-20 14:39 ` Will Newton [this message]
2008-03-20 14:58   ` Johannes Berg
2008-03-20 18:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-03-20 18:35   ` Johannes Berg
2008-03-20 18:39   ` [PATCH/RFC v2] " Johannes Berg
2008-03-20 18:45     ` [PATCH/RFC v3] " Johannes Berg
2008-03-20 19:09       ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-20 19:12         ` Johannes Berg
2008-03-20 19:41       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-03-20 19:50         ` [PATCH/RFC v4] introduce HAVE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_SUPPORT " Johannes Berg
2008-03-21  8:45           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-20 21:13     ` [PATCH/RFC v2] introduce ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS " David Miller
2008-03-20 21:21       ` Johannes Berg
2008-03-20 21:27         ` David Miller
2008-03-20 22:03         ` John W. Linville
2008-03-20 22:10           ` David Miller
2008-03-25 14:11       ` [PATCH/RFC v5] introduce HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS " Johannes Berg
2008-04-02 10:24         ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a5b0800803200739v6d222afck850f221eae1edd70@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=will.newton@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®